Strategy space of player 1 is certain ,. It's the space of player 2 that is uncertain because of incomplete information about its type being theya=1 or theta=-1 .
Pure strategy bayesian Nash can be found out by calculating the expected pay offs of the player 1 with respect to the strategies.
2. (25 pts) Consider a two player game with a payoff matrix (1)/(2) L U D...
3. Consider the following game in normal form. Player 1 is the "row" player with strate- gies a, b, c, d and Player 2 is the "column" player with strategies w, x, y, z. The game is presented in the following matrix: W Z X y a 3,3 2,1 0,2 2,1 b 1,1 1,2 1,0 1,4 0,0 1,0 3,2 1,1 d 0,0 0,5 0,2 3,1 с Find all the Nash equilibria in the game in pure strategies.
8. Consider the two-player game described by the payoff matrix below. Player B L R Player A D 0,0 4,4 (a) Find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria for this game. (b) This game also has a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium; find the probabilities the players use in this equilibrium, together with an explanation for your answer (c) Keeping in mind Schelling's focal point idea from Chapter 6, what equilibrium do you think is the best prediction of how the game will be...
1. (60 marks) Consider a two-person game, in which every player has two pure strategies to play. The payoff matrix of the game is as follows Strategy 2 Player One Player Two Strategy I Strategy II Strategy 1 0,0 1,3 1,1 Find all the Nash equilibria of the game.
1. Consider the following game in normal form. Player 1 is the "row" player with strate- gies a, b, c, d and Player 2 is the "column" player with strategies w, x, y, 2. The game is presented in the following matrix: a b c d w 3,3 1,1 0,0 0,0 x 2,1 1,2 1,0 0,5 y 0,2 1,0 3, 2 0,2 z 2,1 1,4 1,1 3,1 (a) Find the set of rationalizable strategies. (b) Find the set of Nash...
Q.2 Consider the following normal-form game: Player 2 Player 1 3,2 1,1 -1,3 R. 0,0 Q.2.a Identify the pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Q.2.b Identify the mixed-strategy Nash equilibria Q.2.c Calculate each player's expected equilibrium payoff.
Consider the following simultaneous game: Player 2 L R Player 1 U 30,20 -10-10 D -10-10 20.30 Please indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Player 1 has a dominant strategy. This game has two Nash equilibria in pure strategies. Player 1's payoff in each of the Nash equilibria is 30.
Problem 2: Consider the following normal form game: | A | B | C D L 2 ,3 -1,3 0,0 4,3 M -1,0 3,0 / 0,10 2,0 R 1,1 | 2,1 3,1 3,1 Part a: What are the pure strategies that are strictly dominated in the above game? Part 6: What are the rationalizable strategies for each player? What are all the rationalizable strategy profiles? Part c: Find all of the Nash equilibria of the game above.
3. General Extensive Form Game D Suppose the following general extensive form game 1/2 1/2 (2, 2) (2, 2) (0, 6) (6, 0 (0,0 (6, 4) (a) Represent this game in normal form by using a matrix, and find all pure strategy Bayesian Nash equilibrium (equilibria) b) Find pure strategy subgame perfect equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game. c) Find pure strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium (or equilibria) of this game.
4. (General Extensive Form Game ID Suppose the following general extensive-form game. Player 1 Player 2 (0, 4) (4,0 (4, 0) (0, 4) (a) Represent this game in normal form by using a matrix, and find all pure strategy (Bayesian Nash equilibrium (equilibria) b) Does a pure strategy perfect Bayesian equilibrium exist? If so, show it (or them). If not, prove it.
GAME MATRIX Consider two players (Rose as player 1 and Kalum as player 2) in which each player has 2 possible actions (Up or Down for Rose; Left or Right for Kalum. This can be represented by a 2x2 game with 8 different numbers (the payoffs). Write out three different games such that: (a) There are zero pure-strategy Nash equilibria. (b) There is exactly one pure-strategy equilibrium. (c) There are two pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Consider two players (Rose as player...