Question

A plaintiff who sues under res ipsa loquitur must show that A. An event occurred which...

A plaintiff who sues under res ipsa loquitur must show that

A. An event occurred which would not normally occur in the absence of negligence

B. The defendant intended to cause the harm suffered by the plaintiff

C. Other possible causes have been eliminated by the evidence

D. None of the above

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Answer is option a

1.This is legal doctrine "res ipsa loquitur."

2. It means "the thing speaks for itself," and implies that the plaintiff need only show that a particular result occurred and would not have occurred but for someone's negligence.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A plaintiff who sues under res ipsa loquitur must show that A. An event occurred which...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A plaintiff's attorney decides to use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in a case against...

    A plaintiff's attorney decides to use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in a case against the urologist who perforated a patient's urethra during a cystoscopy. What must the plaintiff prove? (Select all that apply.) Note: Credit will be given only if all correct choices and no incorrect choices are selected. a. The locality rule was in effect at the time of the procedure. b. The plaintiff had no control over the development of the perforation. c. The event causing...

  • is the length of time legal action can be taken after an even varics from state...

    is the length of time legal action can be taken after an even varics from state to state. a. Release of tortfeasor b. Respondeat superior c. Statute of limitations d. Locum tenens e. Res ipsa loquitor event has occurred. The time limit nas already been decided by the art and the plaintiff cannot bring a means the case has already been decided by th similar suit against the defendant in the future. a. Release of tortfeasor b. Respondeat superior c....

  • Key Terms ISO Malpractice Negligence NPSGs Plaintiff QA OC Quality Quality indicators Res ipsa loquitur Respondeat...

    Key Terms ISO Malpractice Negligence NPSGs Plaintiff QA OC Quality Quality indicators Res ipsa loquitur Respondeat superior Risk management SAFER Chapter 2 Quality Assurance and legal issues in Healthcare 23 Descriptions A. Acronym for the TJC method used to identify and communicate deficiency risk levels B Accredits and certifies healthcare organizations C. Components of a Col program that are required for TJC accreditation D. Established policies and procedures intended to guarantee excellence of patient care E. Failure to exercise due...

  • 50. A medical practitioner who, through education, training, or experience, has special knowledge about a sbjec...

    50. A medical practitioner who, through education, training, or experience, has special knowledge about a sbjec and gives testimony about that subject in court is called a(n) plaintiff grand jury expert witness judge A B. C D. E defendant 51. A ruling in an earlier court case upon which a subscquent case result is based on precedent. What legal principle is this is called res ipsa loquitor subpoena duces tecum in loco parentis D. A. B. C. stare decisis none...

  • 72. A negligent action is all except A. one in which there is a potential for...

    72. A negligent action is all except A. one in which there is a potential for punishment by loss of licensure is always intentional one in which there is a degree of protection under respondeat superior one in which a person fails to perform an action that a reasonable person would have performed in a similar situation E all of the above 73. Comfort measures for the terminally ill patient include all the following except A B. pain medication oxygen...

  • Book: BUSINESS LAW, Text and Cases Volume I, Clarkson, Miller, & Cross Write summary 20 sentences....

    Book: BUSINESS LAW, Text and Cases Volume I, Clarkson, Miller, & Cross Write summary 20 sentences. Chapter 7 Negligence and Strict Liability Negligence involves acts that depart from a reasonable standard of care, creating an unreasonable risk of harm to others. Strict liability is liability for injury imposed for reasons other than fault.           Negligence                                     Negligence: Failing to exercise the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances. n         In contrast to intentional...

  • Brief Fact Summary. Two women brought lawsuits against West Virginia University Hospital, claiming they were injured...

    Brief Fact Summary. Two women brought lawsuits against West Virginia University Hospital, claiming they were injured as a result of negligent treatment received at the hospital. The trial court did not allow the women to present evidence to support their claims that the doctors who treated them appeared to be hospital employees, when they were actually independent contractors. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A hospital may be found vicariously liable for the negligence a doctor working at the hospital is...

  • Word Bank a. Arbitration b. Plaintiff c. Risk Management d. Negligence Tort e Respondent Superior f....

    Word Bank a. Arbitration b. Plaintiff c. Risk Management d. Negligence Tort e Respondent Superior f. Deposition g. Statute of Limitations h. Defendant i. Patient Incompetence j. Durable Power of Attorney k. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act l. Risk Management m. Locum tenens n. Res ipsa loquitor o. Informed Consent p. Implied Consent q. Living will r. Emancipated minor s. Expressed consent t. Mediation approach u. Subpoena duces tecum v. Good Samaritan Law w. Malpractice x. Patient Self Determination Act y....

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • 1. In a negligence case, to show that the tortfeasor’s conduct was the proximate cause of...

    1. In a negligence case, to show that the tortfeasor’s conduct was the proximate cause of their injuries, the injured party must show that: A. But-for the tortfeasor’s conduct, the injury would not have occurred. B. There is a causal link between the tortfeasor’s conduct and the injury. C. That the tortfeasor owed a special duty of care to the injured party. D. That the injury was a foreseeable result of tortfeasor’s negligence conduct. 2. U.S company ABC Company agrees...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT