This question is related to evaluation of alternatives having unequal lives. However, it is clearly mentioned that the Alternative B is not replaced. It means repeatability method cannot be applicable. Evaluating the investment opportunites by taking their original life using the Present Worth Method.
MARR = 10%
Present Worth of A |
Present Worth of B |
First Cost = 150 Uniform annual benefit = 25 Salvage Value = 20 Life = 15 years PW = -150 + 25 (P/A, 10%, 15) + 20 (P/F, 10%, 15) PW = -150 + 25 (7.60608) + 20 (0.23939) PW = 44.94 |
First Cost = 100 Uniform annual benefit = 22.25 Salvage Value = 00 Life = 10 years PW = -100 + 22.25 (P/A, 10%, 10) PW = -100 + 22.25 (6.14457) PW = 36.72 |
As per the PW method, the Investment Opportunity – A should be selected because of highest present worth.
Alternatively
Here we can use the incremental cash flow approach also. Calculate the incremental cash flow between the alternative A – B
Year |
A |
B |
A-B |
0 |
-150 |
-100 |
-50 |
1 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
2 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
3 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
4 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
5 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
6 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
7 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
8 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
9 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
10 |
25 |
22.25 |
2.75 |
11 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
12 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
13 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
14 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
15 |
25+10 |
0 |
35 |
Calculate PW of the Incremental Cash Flow.
PW = -50 + 2.75 (P/A, 10%, 10) + 25 (P/A, 10%, 5) (P/F, 10%, 10) + 10 (P/F, 10%, 15)
PW = -50 + 2.75 (6.14457) + 25 (3.79079) (0.38554) + 10 (0.23939)
PW = 5.83
PW between (A – B) > 0, Select A
Two investment opportunities are as follows А $150 B $100 22.25 First cost Initial investment) Uniform...
Need cash flow diagram 04) Three mutually exclusive alternative are being considered Initial Cost Benefit at the end of the first Year Uniform Annual Benefits at end of subsequent years Useful Life in years $500 $200 $100 $400 $200 $125 $300 $200 $100 At the end of its useful life, an alternative is not replaced. If MARR is 10%, which alternatives should be selected? a) Based on the payback period? b) Based on benefit-cost ratio analysis c) Benefit/Costs Analysis using...
9-54 Three mutually exclusive alternatives are beine A considered: $500 $400 $300 200 100 Initial cost Benefit at end of the first 200 200 year Uniform benefit at end of 100 125 subsequent years Useful life, in years 4 At the end of its useful life, an alternative is not replaced. If the MARR is 10%, which alternative should be selected (a) Based on the payback period? (b) Based on benefit-cost ratio analysis? 9-54 Three mutually exclusive alternatives are beine...
Three mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered: Initial cost Benefit at end of the first $500 $400 $300 200 200 200 year Uniform benefit at end of 100 125 100 subsequent years Useful life, in years 4 At the end of its useful life, an alternative is not replaced. If the MARR is 10%, which alternative should be selected (a) Based on the payback period? (b) Based on benefit-cost ratio analysis?
9- Two alternatives with identical benefits are being considered: 49 A B Initial cost $500 $800 Uniform annual cost 200 150 Useful life, in years 8 8 (a) Compute the payback period if Alt. B is purchased rather than Alt. A (b) Use a MARR of 10% and benefit-cost ratio analysis to identify the alternative that should be selected
Do not use Excel or tables 9-54 Three mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered: Initial cost Benefit at end of the first $500 $400 $300 200 200 200 100 4 year Uniform benefit at end of 100 125 subsequent years Useful life, in years At the end of its useful life, an alternative is not replaced. If the MARR is 10%, which alternative should be selected (a) Based on the payback period? (b) Based on benefit-cost ratio analysis?
selected? urm is considering three mutually exclusive alter- atives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are as follows: First cost $15,000 Maintenance 1,600 and operating Annual benefit 8,000 Salvage value 3,000 Useful life, in years4 Installed cost Uniform annual benefit Useful life, in years A B C $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 1.625 1.625 1,890 10 20 For each alternative, the salvage value at the end of useful life is zero. At the end of 10 years, Alt. A...
QUESTION 6 Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternatives B $4,000 $800 А Initial Cost $5,000 Annual Benefits (beginning at end of $1,500 year 1) Annual Costs (beginning at end of year $500 1) Salvage Value $500 Useful Life (years) 5 $200 $0 10 Compute the net present worth for each alternative and choose the better alternative. MARR = 8%
Please don't use excel and show all work. Consider two alternatives: B A $300 $500 $75 Cost $75 Uniform annual benefit X Infinity Useful life, in years Assume that Alt. B is not replaced at the end of its useful life. If the MARR is 10%, what must be the useful life of B to make Alternatives A and B equally desirable?
1) Consider these two machines (alternatives): (12 Points) B A $5000 $1750 $700 $8200 $1850 $500 First Cost Uniform annual benefit Salvage Value Useful Life, in Years 4 If the MARR (minimum attractive rate of return) -7 % , which alternative should be selected? Use the Present worth Analysis method. 1) Consider these two machines (alternatives): (12 Points) B A $5000 $1750 $700 $8200 $1850 $500 First Cost Uniform annual benefit Salvage Value Useful Life, in Years 4 If the...
international genetic technologies inc. (InGen) is examining the following three mutually exclusive alternatives. 3) Using benefit-cost ratio analysis, a 10-year useful life and a MARR of 25%, determine which of the following mutually exclusive models should be selected. А в C D E Initial Cost $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $37 $60 $83 $137 $150 Annual Benefits 4) A big box company is using a benefit-cost ratio analysis to select which one of the 3 alternatives shown below should be...