Question

Prepare a written report discussing an ethical accounting issue. You should select an article from accounting periodicals such as The CPA Journal, Journal of Accountancy, Accounting Technology Magazine, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, etc. Textbooks should not be used. The paper should include a summary of the article including the main points by the author, your reaction to the article, and the bibliography.

Answer 1

Please do Upvote if you are served. Feel free to reach out in the comments

Cheers!!!

Answer( Originally written)

In March, a jury indicted David Middendorf, the previous national overseeing accomplice for review quality, on claims that he was associated with endeavors to take classified administrative data so as to enable the firm to improve on supervisory tests led by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. A jury additionally sentenced Jeffrey Wada, a previous board representative blamed for passing mysteries to KPMG about coming assessments.

Two other previous KPMG officials, Thomas Whittle and Cynthia Holder, have confessed to criminal accusations. A third previous KPMG accomplice, Brian Sweet, conceded and helped out examiners. Another previous accomplice, David Britt, faces preliminary in October.

The bookkeeping board manages open organization inspectors. The SEC oversees the board's work.

The previous KPMG accomplices looked for the data on the grounds that the firm had much of the time got a high pace of review insufficiencies from the load up's assessors. The previous KPMG work force needed to improve their outcomes, the SEC claimed. The previous authorities at KPMG modified work papers in 2016 to bring down the opportunity that assessors would discover lacks in their reviews of banking customers, as indicated by the settlement request. Others inside KPMG found the unfortunate behavior and announced it to the organization's authority.

The SEC reported Monday that KPMG work force likewise undermined inward, proceeding training tests intended to test their comprehension of bookkeeping standards.

Review experts, including the two previous commitment accomplices, shared test answers with one another, trading pictures of the appropriate responses by email or instant message, as per the request. At times, reviewers utilized a stunt that changed directions on an Internet server, which permitted them to pass the preparation by effectively noting only 25% of the inquiries.

KPMG LLP consented to pay $50 million to settle claims that previous representatives got an unlawful sneak look at controllers' arrangements to review its work and evaluators at the firm undermined inner preparing tests.

The company's settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission wraps up a two-year test of a moral breakdown at the firm that previously prompted the criminal feelings of four previous review accomplices or supervisors. The SEC's polite examination found the unfortunate behavior went on for quite a long while before KPMG authorities announced it to controllers.

Notwithstanding the $50 million punishment, KPMG consented to keep exploring what number of its examiners undermined the preparation tests and to have an outside expert audit those discoveries, just as check KPMG's inner approaches identified with morals. Two "commitment accomplices," who are administrators with essential obligation regarding reviewing open organizations, occupied with the test extortion, as indicated by the SEC's settlement request. The request didn't distinguish the accomplices, who never again work for KPMG.

Source: WSJ journal on KPMG paying $50 Million penalty for the unethical behavior by employees' misconduct