Mary Inc. is considering mutually exclusive Projects A and B, whose cash flows are shown below. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, will there be any value loss due to the IRR-based decision? If there is a loss, how much value will be forgone? The WACC is assumed to be 9.5%.
WACC: Year |
9.5% |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
CFA |
−$2,020 |
$730 |
$730 |
$740 |
$740 |
|
CFB |
−$4,100 |
$1,400 |
$1,500 |
$1,520 |
$1,530 |
Using EXCEL's Goal Seek Function to solve for IRR (the WACC at which NPV is zero), we observe that Project A's IRR is greater (at 16.85 % ) and hence the same should be selected.
As is observable NPV (B) > NPV(A). This implies a loss in value if the IRR criterion is used to select the project, as Project A would be selected in such a case even though it has a lower NPV.
Value Loss = NPV(B) - NPV(A) = 651.5 - 333.84 = $ 317.65
Mary Inc. is considering mutually exclusive Projects A and B, whose cash flows are shown below....
Mary Inc. is considering mutually exclusive Projects A and B, whose cash flows are shown below. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, will there be any value loss due to the IRR-based decision? If there is a loss, how much value will be forgone? The WACC is assumed to be 9.5%. WACC: Year 9.5% 0 1 2 3 4 CFA −$2,020 $730 $730 $740 $740 CFB −$4,100 $1,400 $1,500 $1,520 $1,530 Please do...
Mary Inc. is considering mutually exclusive Projects A and B,
whose cash flows are shown below. If the decision is made by
choosing the project with the higher IRR, will there be any value
loss due to the IRR-based decision? If there is a loss, how much
value will be forgone? The WACC is assumed to be 9.5%.
WACC: Year CF CF 9.5 % $73 $1,50 $740 $2,020 $4,100 $730 $740 1 $1,400 S1,520 $1,530
Sexton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows
are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally
risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the
project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note
that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the
IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the
higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? WACC: 8% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -2,200 $730 $730 $730 $730 Options: 59.24, 52,83, 48,56, 43.70, 39.24
Carolina Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash
flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive,
equally risky, and are not repeatable. If the decision is made by
choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be
forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the
basis of the IRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. Identify also
the range of discounting rates in which project L will be
selected.
WACC: Year...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 4 -$1,100 -$2,200 12 $375 $375 $725...
Carolina Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and are not repeatable. WACC: 7.75% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS −$1,050 $675 $650 CFL −$1,050 $360 $360 $360 $360 If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? What is the underlying...
Question 8 of 24 Yonan Inc. is considering Projects Sand L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 10.25% 1 3 $500...
Question 20 1 pts Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 9.50% -$950 $500...