rate positively ..
Cumulative cash flow | Present value | ||||||||
Year | CFs | CFL | CFs | CFL | PVIF @ 9.5% | PV S | PV L | ||
0 | -950 | -2100 | -950 | -2100 | 1 | (950.00) | (2,100.00) | ||
1 | 500 | 400 | -450 | -1700 | 0.913242009 | 456.62 | 365.30 | ||
2 | 800 | 800 | 350 | -900 | 0.834010967 | 667.21 | 667.21 | ||
3 | 0 | 800 | 350 | -100 | 0.761653851 | - | 609.32 | ||
4 | 0 | 1000 | 350 | 900 | 0.695574293 | - | 695.57 | ||
173.83 | 237.40 | ||||||||
Therefore Payback of project S will be lower as we can see cumulative cash flow is positive in early year. | |||||||||
Payback period for S = | 1+450/800 | ||||||||
1.56 | |||||||||
But based on present value project S has NPV of 173.83 while project L has higher NPV of 237.4 | |||||||||
Therefore value lost = 237.4-173.83 | 63.57 | ||||||||
ans = | 63.57 |
Question 20 1 pts Yonan Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are...
Question 8 of 24 Yonan Inc. is considering Projects Sand L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the shorter payback, some value may be forgone. How much value will be lost in this instance? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the shorter payback will not cause value to be lost. WACC: 10.25% 1 3 $500...
Sexton Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows
are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally
risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the
project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note
that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the
IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the
higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, so no value...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the basis of the MIRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. WACC: 10.75% 4 -$1,100 -$2,200 12 $375 $375 $725...
Carolina Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash
flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive,
equally risky, and are not repeatable. If the decision is made by
choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be
forgone? Note that under some conditions choosing projects on the
basis of the IRR will cause $0.00 value to be lost. Identify also
the range of discounting rates in which project L will be
selected.
WACC: Year...
Moerdyk & Co. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? Note that under certain conditions choosing projects on the basis of the IRR will not cause any value to be lost because the one with the higher IRR will also have the higher NPV, i.e., no...
Nast Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher MIRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much value will be forgone? WACC: 8% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,100 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -2,200 $730 $730 $730 $730 Options: 59.24, 52,83, 48,56, 43.70, 39.24
Question 3 of 24 Tesar Chemicals is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the NPV. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher NPV, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the chosen NPV versus the...
Carolina Company is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and are not repeatable. WACC: 7.75% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS −$1,050 $675 $650 CFL −$1,050 $360 $360 $360 $360 If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much value will be forgone? What is the underlying...
b Multiple Choicc 11-108 Question of 25 Noe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the...
Murray Inc. is considering Projects and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. What is the cross-over rute? WACC -6 5380 5380 SINO 51,025 -52,150 $380 5755 5755 5755