Question

_7. Galice Lorenzo, CPA has disclosed client information as part of an ethics violation for a state board of accountancy inve
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1. The recently revised AICPA Code of Professional Conduct includes a new Confidential Client Information Rule under Section 1.700.001, which expands the guidance on maintaining the confidentiality of client information.

The general thought previously has been that if CPA tax practitioners were complying with Sec. 7216 and revisions of its related regulations that went into effect six years ago (Regs. Secs. 301.7216-1 through 301.7216-3), they were complying with the less detailed AICPA code Rule 301, Client Confidential Information.

Now that the new AICPA guidance with its expanded interpretations has taken effect (on Dec. 15, 2014), members are encouraged to assess their practices for compliance with both sets of rules.

New AICPA Confidential Client Information Rule

Former Rule 301 stated that “a member in public practice shall not disclose any confidential client information without the specific consent of the client,” but did not state the method for obtaining the consent. However, Rule 391, Ethics Rulings on Responsibilities to Clients, suggested that the consent be in writing (see Interpretation 391-2, “Disclosure of Client Information to Third Parties”). Former Rule 301 provided exceptions to the consent requirement for complying with Rule 202, Compliance With Standards, and Rule 203, Accounting Principles; complying with a valid subpoena, summons, or applicable statutes and government regulations; conducting a review of a member’s professional practice under AICPA or state CPA authority; or initiating or responding to a complaint made by a professional ethics organization. One interpretation under the rule regarding confidential information and the purchase, sale, or merger of a practice stated that client consent is not required in connection with a review of client confidential information in connection with the purchase, sale, or merger of a practice. The member, however, should take appropriate precautions (i.e., use nondisclosure agreements) to protect against the prospective purchaser’s disclosing confidential information.

2. The State Board rules do not allow commissions or contingent fees if the CPA performs, for the client, "...a compilation of a financial statement accompanied by a report..." The AICPA rules prohibit commissions or contingent fees if the CPA performs, for the client, "... a compilation of a financial statement when the member expects, or reasonably might expect, that a third party will use the financial statement, and the member's compilation report does not disclose a lack of independence." Accordingly, if a CPA is not independent of a client, performs a compilation, and discloses the lack of independence, he or she could receive a commission or contingent fee, from that client, under the AICPA rules, but could not receive such fees under the State Board rules.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
_7. Galice Lorenzo, CPA has disclosed client information as part of an ethics violation for a...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Situation No. 3. Continued A. Independence--No Violation B. Independence - Violation L. Contingent Fees. -No Violation...

    Situation No. 3. Continued A. Independence--No Violation B. Independence - Violation L. Contingent Fees. -No Violation J. Contingent Fees - Violation C. Integrity and Objectivity. -No Violation K. Acts Discreditable--No Violation D. Integrity and Objectivity--Violation L. Acts Discreditable..Violation E Accounting Principle. No Violation F. Accounting Principle--Violation M. Advertising and Solicitation-No Violation N. Advertising and Solicitation--Violation G. Confidential Client Inf. -No Violation H. Confidential Client Inf... Violation 0. Commissions and Referrals-No Violation P. Commissions and Referrals-Violation 6. Fryson, CPA, is a...

  • Situation No. 3: AICPA Code of Professional Conduct For cach situation, Identify the most applicable AICPA...

    Situation No. 3: AICPA Code of Professional Conduct For cach situation, Identify the most applicable AICPA rule of conduct and whether there is a violation or no violation of the rule. A. Independence- - No Violation B. Independence--Violation L. Contingent Fees--No Violation J. Contingent Fees-- Violation C. Integrity and Objectivity. -No Violation K. Acts Discreditable-No Violation D. Integrity and Objectivity. Violation L. Acts Discreditable Violation E. Accounting Principle--No Violation F. Accounting Principle--Violation M. Advertising and Solicitation-No Violation N. Advertising and...

  • For each situation (1-5), select the most applicable AICPA rule of conduct and F). One or...

    For each situation (1-5), select the most applicable AICPA rule of conduct and F). One or more letters may not be used. ether there is a violation or no violation of the rule (A- A. Independence Rule: no violation B. Independence Rule, violation C. Confidential Client Information Rule; no violation D. Confidential Client Information Rule: violation E. Fees and Other Types of Remuneration Rule, no violation F. Fees and Other Types of Remuneration Rule: violation Jackson, CPA, and one of...

  • 4-22 (OBJECTIVES 4-5,4-7) Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.

    4-22 (OBJECTIVES 4-5,4-7) Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. For each situation, state the applicable rule of conduct and whether it is a violation.a. Emrich, CPA, provides tax services, management advisory services, and bookkeeping services and also conducts audits for the same nonpublic client. Because the firm is small, the same person often provides all the services.b. Steve Custer, CPA, set up a casualty and fire insurance agency to complement...

  • .Providing bookkeeping services to an audit client 5-18 (Objectives 5-5, 5-6) Each of the following situations...

    .Providing bookkeeping services to an audit client 5-18 (Objectives 5-5, 5-6) Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the IESBA's Code of Ethics, For each situation, state the fundamental principle related the situation and whether it is a violation. a. Fadl Shaker is a CPA, but not a partner, with three years of professional experience with Shaker & Shaker, CPAS. He owns 25 shares of stock in an audit client of the firm, but he does not...

  • For each of the following independent situations, state whether the CPA has violated generally accepted auditing...

    For each of the following independent situations, state whether the CPA has violated generally accepted auditing standards and/or the CPA Ontario Professional Code of Ethics. Explain your reasoning. (That is, violated/not violated and then explain why?) a. Emily, CPA, completed an audit of the financial statements of Major Breakthrough Inc. (MBI), a public company. During the audit, she became privy to information that MBI’s most recent major breakthrough was falsified and the information was going to made public in the...

  • Provided is a list of actions or situations that show a violation of the AICPA Code...

    Provided is a list of actions or situations that show a violation of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. For each case, select the relevant rule that is being violated. Relevant Rule or Interpretation a. Your client. Contrary Corporation, is very upset over the fact that your audit last year failed to detect an $800,000 inventory overstatement caused by employee theft and falsification of the records. The board discussed the matter and authorized its attorneys to explore the possibility of...

  • [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In the largest criminal tax case ever...

    [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] In the largest criminal tax case ever filed, KPMG admitted it engaged in a fraud that generated at least $11 billion dollars in phony tax losses, which, according to court papers, cost the United States at least $2.5 billion dollars in evaded taxes. In addition to KPMG's former deputy chairman, the individuals indicted included two former heads of KPMG's tax practice and a former tax partner in the New York City...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT