Interest Rate = 6%
Planning horizon = 10 years
Therefore, Alternative has to be repeated two times. Alternative A has the life of 5 years and to be equal to planning horizon, it is to be repeated two times.
Alternative A
Initial Cost = 4,500
Annual Cost = 300
Salvage Value = 500
PW = 4,500 + 4,500 (P/F, 6%, 5) + 300 (P/A, 6%, 10) – 500 (P/F, 6%, 5) – 500 (P/F, 6%, 10)
PW = 4,500 + 4,500 (0.74726) + 300 (7.36009) – 500 (0.74726) – 500 (0.55839)
PW = 9,418
Alternative B
Initial Cost = 5,500
Annual Cost = 400
Salvage Value = 0
PW = 5,500 + 400 (P/A, 6%, 10)
PW = 5,500 + 400 (7.36009)
PW = 8,444
On the basis of PW comparison, select the Alternative B because of less PW or less cost.
Both the alternatives are cost dominated. So, the negative sign to cost is ignored and salvage value is deducted.
The Larkspur Furniture Company needs a new grinder. Compute the present worth for these mutu- ally...
57 The Larkspur grinder. Compute ally exclusive alta would recommend pin sour Furniture Company needs a new Compute the present worth for these mutu- alusive alternatives and identify which you Sammend given i = 6% per year. Larkspur uses a 10-year planning horizon. Alternative A $5500 $400 Initial cost Annual costs Salvage value Life $4500 $300 $500 5 years 10 years Cowtributed by Gillian Nicholls, Southeast Missouri State University
i dont want excel answer 5- The Larkspur Furniture Company needs a new grinder. 37 Compute the present worth for these mutually exclusive alternatives and identify which you would recommend given i = 6% per year. Larkspur uses a 10-year planning horizon. Alternative B A Initial cost $4500 $5500 Annual costs $300 $400 Salvage value $500 $0 Life 5 years 10 years
Question 4. (20 points): The Big Discount Furniture Store (BDFS) needs a new generator. Compute the present worth for these mutually exclusive alternative and identify which you would recommend giving the interest ratei - 5,5% per year. BDFS use a 10-year planning horizon. Alternative Initial cost Salvage value Life $4500 $500 5 years $5500 $0 10 years
A company needs a new mechanical device. Compute the present worth for these mutually exclusive alternatives. Identify which you would recommend and why for given i=10% per year. The company uses a 12-years planning horizon. Initial Cost Annual Costs Salvage Value Life Alternative A $8000 $700 $900 6 years Alternative B $10000 $800 $700 12 years
Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 10% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 20 years $15,000 $45,000 Capital Investment Operating Costs $4,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $400 per year thereafter $4,000 every 5 years 20 years $8,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $800 per year thereafter None Overhaul Costs Life 10 years Salvage Value $8,000 if just...
Compare two alternatives, A and B. on the basis of a present worth evaluation using /= 10% per year and a study period of 8 years. Alternative A B First Cost $-19,000 $-46,000 Annual Operating Cost $-6,000 $-10,000 Overhaul in Year 4 $0 $-3,850 Salvage Value $1,200 $6,200 Life 8 years 4 years The present worth of alternative A is $ and that of alternative B is $ Alternative (Click to select) is selected.
Can someone help me with part b? I can not seem to find the correct answer for present worth of B1 with 10 year planning horizon or the present worth of B2 with 10 year planning horizon. Consider the two mutually exclusive projects in the table below. Salvage values represent the net proceeds (after tax) from disposal of the assets if they are sold at the end of each year. Both projects B1 and B2 will be available (or can...
Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 11% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 12 years. $25,000 $10,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $1,000 per year thereafter None Capital Investment Operating Costs $55,000 $5,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $500 per year thereafter $5,000 every 3 years 12 years $10,000 if just overhauled Overhaul Costs Life 6 years negligible...
QUESTION 6 Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternatives B $4,000 $800 А Initial Cost $5,000 Annual Benefits (beginning at end of $1,500 year 1) Annual Costs (beginning at end of year $500 1) Salvage Value $500 Useful Life (years) 5 $200 $0 10 Compute the net present worth for each alternative and choose the better alternative. MARR = 8%
Compare 10 years the alternatives C and D on the basis of a present worth analysis using an interest rate of 10% per year and a study period of Alternative rst Cost Annual Increase in Operating Cost, per Year Salvage Value $-1,000 $-1.200 0 The present worth of alternative C is S?m) and that of altern Click to select)offers the lower present worth analysis ative Dis $