My question is about game theory. Say we have a game with mixed equilibria, but no pure Nash equilibria. How does the strategy of one player affect the strategy of the other player in a mixed equilibrium?
Mixed strategy Nash equilibrium is the probability distribution that is given to each of the actions with the likelihood of being selected.
This type of strategy is randomized ie atleast one player randomly chooses the strategy and no player can increase his expected payoff by playing an alternate strategy.
In simple words, if one player would randomly choose our randomize between strategies only when he has the same expected payoff from both. If one gives more expected payoff than the other then he won't be indifferent between them.
We consider the example of matching pennies game
Player 2
Player 1
Head | tail | |
Head | (1,-1) | (-1,1) |
Tail | (-1,1) | (1,-1) |
Here suppose that player one knows that player 2 plays head with probability p which implies that player one when chooses head would get payoff 1 with probability p and-1 with probability(1-p).
So the expected payoff is 1(P)+(-1)(1-p) = 2p-1
Similarly player 1' s expected utility when he chooses tail given player 2 is choosing head with probability p
Expected payoff is (-1)P+(1)(1-p) = 1-2p
Now we know that player 1 would be indifferent only when the payoffs give same value.
So this means that the payoffs are equal ie
1-2p= 2p-1
4p= 2
P= 1/2
Thus Row randomizes to make Column indifferent and vice versa. That would lead to each player playing the best. One player needs to randomize in order to let other be indifferent would be the strategy in mixed equilibrium.
(You can comment for doubts)
My question is about game theory. Say we have a game with mixed equilibria, but no...
I SEE THAT SOME PEOPLE SAY A, AND OTHERS SAY C. WHICH ONE IS CORRECT, OR ARE THEY BOTH CORRECT? D E A 7,1 1,1 В 5,2 5,2 С 1,1 7,1 Player Consider the strategic form game above and select all that apply The game has two pure strategy Nash Equilibria Strategy B is a best response to strategy D. There is a mixed strategy equilibrium in the game. In the mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium of the game Player 1...
a.) Find all pure-strategy Nash equilibria. b.) *Find all mixed-strategy Nash equilibria. c.) Explain why, in any mixed-strategy equilibrium, each player must be indifferent between the pure strategies that she randomizes over. Consider the following game: - 2 LR 2
a) Eliminate strictly dominated strategies.b) If the game does not have a pure strategy Nash equilibrium,find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for the smaller game(after eliminating dominated strategies). Player 2Player 1abcA4,33,22,4B1,35,33,3
6. Consider the following game: a. Identify all Nash Equilibria (Pure Strategy and Mixed) of this simultaneous game. b. Draw the two extensive form games that arise from each firm moving first. What are the Subgame Perfect Equilibria of these games? c. Identify a trigger strategy for each player that sustains (B,B) as an equilibrium. For what interest (discount) rates will this outcome be sustainable?
Consider the following game: a) Identify all Nash Equilibria (Pure Strategy and Mixed) of this simultaneous game. b) Identify a trigger strategy for each player that sustains (B,B) as an equilibrium in an infinitely repeated game. For what interest(discount) rates will this outcome be sustainable? Firm 2 А B A -5,-5 195,-50 Firm 1 -50,215 45,75
3. For each of the following statements, say whether it is true or false, and explain your answer. (a) "A roll-back equilibrium is not a Nash equilibrium.. (b) "If a simultaneous-move game has pure strategy equilibria, the game cannot have mixed strategy equilibria too." (c) "Players who have a strictly dominant pure strategy will never choose to play a mixed strategy."
Consider the following extensive-form game with two players, 1 and 2. a). Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of the game. [8 Marks] b). Find the pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibria of the game. [6 Marks] c). Derive the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the subgame. If players play this mixed Nash equilibrium in the subgame, would 1 player In or Out at the initial mode? [6 Marks] [Hint: Write down the normal-form of the subgame and derive the mixed Nash equilibrium of...
How many Nash Equilibria in pure strategies does this game have? Question 3 0,1 1,0 0,0 How many Nash Equilibria in pure strategies does this game have? ооооо
Please answer 3 Questions, thank you. 4. Consider the following game: PLAYER 2 (0,3) (2,0) (1,7) PLAYER 1 (2,4) (0,6) (2,0) (1,3) (2,4) (0,3) a) Does this game have any pure-strategy Nash equilibrium? If so, identify it (or them) and explain why this is an equilibrium. b) Find a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium to this game and explain your calculations. Note: a mixed strategy for player i may be expressed by o; = (P1, P2, 1- P1 - p2). c) Is...
GAME MATRIX Consider two players (Rose as player 1 and Kalum as player 2) in which each player has 2 possible actions (Up or Down for Rose; Left or Right for Kalum. This can be represented by a 2x2 game with 8 different numbers (the payoffs). Write out three different games such that: (a) There are zero pure-strategy Nash equilibria. (b) There is exactly one pure-strategy equilibrium. (c) There are two pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Consider two players (Rose as player...