Where do you think we would be without governmental involvement in the economy as regards our standard of living?
SOLUTION
ECONOMY WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT
THE ECONOMIC ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT, " FOCUS ON THE STABILITY, NOT SPENDING "
Without government intervention firms can exploit monopoly to pay low wages to workers and charge high prices for consumers . Without government intervention the firms are liable to see the growth of monopoly power. Government intervention can regulate monopolies and control competition. In order to regulate monopolies there is a need of government intervention.
THE NEED FOR GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT OR INTEVENTION
The government must focus on maintaining economic stability. Fiscal responsibility is an important part of the stability.Government debt can quickly become a burden on the economy and weaken its foundations. Sound macroeconomic policies can enhance the credibility of the government and strengthen the political institutions. IN order to restore the economic stability, policy makers must focus on restoring the institutional role of governing. Government can provide a stable environment for economic growth when it can be depended to maintain the stability of the currency enforce and defend property rights and provides oversight that assures private citizens that their transaction partners in the market place are held accountable. This will allow the market participants to begin putting their resources back to work in the areas where they are most beneficial.
After decades of lecturing developing countries on how to emerge from economic crisis and stimulate economic growth through sound government policies, some economists are throwing out all their advice during the first major crisis test. This is particularly true when it comes to advice on accumulating more and more debt.
Government spending and government deficits automatically increase during the economic downturns due to more demands on social - safety - net provisions and falling tax revenues
Where do you think we would be without governmental involvement in the economy as regards our...
• What are your views on the role of government • Where do you think we would be without governmental involvement in the economy as regards our standard of living?
Why do you think it is important that prices are flexible in our economy? Do you think they reflect the true price of what buyers and sellers are asking in the market? Also, identify one product that has changed in price and identify if it is a determinant of supply or demand to explain the price change that has occurred.
3. Do you think GDP is a good measurement for our standard of living? Why or why not? 4. What do you think the biggest challenge to economic growth? How can wealthier nations help poor countries raise their standard of living? Be brief and concise.
Free discussion.! Do you think we wash our hands as well as we should? As often as we should? How well should a health care facility be cleaned? Do you think our patients and their families care about a clean environment? Have you ever walked into a health care facility and thought it not clean? What did you do? Does it matter? What do you think?
What governmental and non-profit organization policies and initiatives do you think would be the most effective at improving a country's ongoing economic development.
Tell me what you think the world would be without social media? What do you think your life would be without social media? Could you live in a world without social media? Please write 4 pages double-spaced.
What other indicator do you think we should look at to determine if an economy is "strong"? You might get some ideas by looking at the "FRED" database. Or alternatively, of the indicators discussed in the lessons, which do you think is most important? Why?
Since we mainly practice a more naturalistic system in our society, do you think that our system of medicine would benefit from adding some of the characteristics from the personalistic system that is practiced in many Non-Western cultures. If so, which ones, and why. If not, why not? In other words, what advantages, if any, does a more personalistic system of medicine have over a naturalistic system of medicine in terms of diagnosis, treatment, relationships between patient and medical practitioner,...
What do you think we need to address and work with our patients, when addressing their health behaviors? What would you like to see health care doing more of in order to decrease these negative health behaviors and increase the positive ones? And lastly, what are the barriers to make and maintaining change?
Given the arguments of Duska and Corvino, do you think we should have loyalty to our places of employment?