Question

Problem 2 This is the continuation of Problem 2 in Homework 3, but with questions about...

Problem 2

This is the continuation of Problem 2 in Homework 3, but with questions about tradable permits.

Two steel factories are currently emitting 8,000 tons of pollution each (for a total of 16,000 tons). Pollution reduction (abatement) costs for Plant 1 are given by MCR1= 0.02Q and for Plant 2 by MCR2 = 0.03Q, where Q represents tons of abatement, and MCR the marginal cost of pollution reduction.

  1. Suppose a tradable permit system is instituted in which permits for emissions of 6,000 tons of pollution are freely issued, 3,000 permits to each plant. What are the pollution reduction costs to each firm without trading? Use a graph on excel to support your answer, showing 10,000 tons of total pollution reduction.
  1. Using the same diagram you drew in Part A, explain which firm will sell permits (and how many), and which firm will buy permits. Assuming all permits sell for the same price, how much will each permit cost? Calculate each firm’s net costs after trading, considering their pollution reduction costs and the costs (or revenues) from the permit sale.
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

A). Without trading each firm have reduce 5000 tons of pollution,

So marginal cost of firm 1 of abatement=0.02Q

Total coat of firm 1 of abatement=0.01*Q^2

So cost of 5000 abatement=0.01*5000*5000=250,000

Same for firm 2

MCR=0.03Q

TCR=0.15*Q^2

TCR=0.015*5000*5000=375,000

abete munt fa50,000 MCRZ MERI 5000 CRA Yatatement CR tent 150 McR जिफट 321000)

B)MCR=1=0.02Q. ,MCR2=0.03Q

Q1=MCR/0.02. Q2= mcr/0.03

Q=q1+q1=mcr/0.02+mcr/0.03=5mcr/0.06

MCR=0.06Q/5

Abatement =10,000

MCR=0.06*10000/5=120

MCR1=0.02Q1. MCR2=0.03Q2

120=0.02Q1. 120=0.03Q2

Q1=6000. Q2=4000

So firm 2 will sell permit of 1000 tons .and firm 1 will buy it.

The permit price=abatement cost of those 1000 tons to firm 1

Permit price =0.01*6000*6000-0.01*5000*5000=110,000

Firm 1 net cost =0.01*6000*6000+110,000=347,000

Firm 2 net cost =0.015*4000*4000-110,000=130,000

YeRetyooD C6oogeee) jont 20 MCR Joit M CRFw2 10/000

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Problem 2 This is the continuation of Problem 2 in Homework 3, but with questions about...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Question 17 (1 point) After trading permits, firm K will pollute O 40 070 O 50...

    Question 17 (1 point) After trading permits, firm K will pollute O 40 070 O 50 100 2. Tradable permits Suppose the authorities are considering a tradable emission permit system in which they give each firm 55 permits Information for the first 24 questions Two plants are emitting a uniformly mixed pollutant called gunk into the beautiful sky over Tourist-Town. Plant G has marginal reduction costs of 200-2x1, while plant K has marginal reduction costs of 100-X2. where X, and...

  • A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars...

    A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160–4E a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of pollution...

  • Q.4. (45 Points) Suppose that under the Michigan’s voluntary emission trading program, the object...

    Q.4. (45 Points) Suppose that under the Michigan’s voluntary emission trading program, the objective for the two major firms in an urban area is a 50 percent reduction in carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from 120 units to 60 units. Each firm face the following costs: Firm 1: TAC1=2000+0.6(A1) 2 MAC1=1.2A1 Firm 2: TAC2=1000+0.2(A2) 2 MAC2=0.4A2, where A1 and A2 represent the percentages of CO emission abatement achieved by Firm 1 and Firm 2, respectively, and TAC and MAC are measured...

  • 1. A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Suppose that, after...

    1. A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160–4E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of...

  • 3. Working with Numbers and Graphs Q3 Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution...

    3. Working with Numbers and Graphs Q3 Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 tons of pollution, for a total of 12 tons. The government is considering the following two methods to reduce total pollution to 6 tons: 1. The government sets regulation specifying that each of the three firms must cut its pollution in half. 2. The government allocates two tradable pollution permits to each of the...

  • the last fill in the blank (less/more) 5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable...

    the last fill in the blank (less/more) 5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government...

  • correcting for negative externalities-regulation versus tradable permits 5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable...

    correcting for negative externalities-regulation versus tradable permits 5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government...

  • Possible Solutions Total Cost of eliminating 2 units of pollution The options for the first fill in the blank (Firm X) are: $295, $120, $215, $320. The options for the second fill in the blank (Firm...

    Possible Solutions Total Cost of eliminating 2 units of pollution The options for the first fill in the blank (Firm X) are: $295, $120, $215, $320. The options for the second fill in the blank (Firm Y) are: $1250, $800, $1850, $1500 The options for the third fill in the blank (Firm Z) are: $180, $250, $230, $100 The options for the forth fill in the blank are: $1490, $2420, $1625, $1645 Firm X Firm Y Firm Z Initial pollution...

  • For questions (2) and (3) suppose the government imposes an emission standard on the firms requiring...

    For questions (2) and (3) suppose the government imposes an emission standard on the firms requiring Firm 1 to reduce emissions by 30 tons and Firm 2 to reduce emissions by 20 tons. Question 2 10 pts Does the emission standard bring about a cost-effective allocation of pollution control responsibility? Yes NO Question 3 10 pts Calculate the total cost of pollution control for Firm 1 and for Firm 2. TCC1 - $ TCC2 = $ rvices Consider an industry...

  • Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits

    Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods:Available Methods to Reduce Pollution1.The government sets pollution standards using regulation.2.The government allocates tradable pollution permits.Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT