Question

Intermediate Accounting Volume 1 (12th Canadian Edition)

CA5.1 In the late 1990s, CIBC helped Enron Corporation structure 34 “loans” that appeared in the financial statements as cash proceeds from sales of assets. Enron subsequently went bankrupt in 2001 and left many unhappy investors and creditors with billions of dollars lost. In December 2003, CIBC settled four regulatory investigations with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Federal Reserve, U.S. Justice Department, and Canadian Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions. The settlement, which amounted to U.S. $80 million, was then one of the largest regulatory penalties against a Canadian bank. The regulatory authorities felt that CIBC had aided Enron in boosting its earnings and hiding debt. CIBC set aside a $109-million reserve in early 2003 in preparation for this settlement. No additional reserves were set aside. As part of the settlement, CIBC agreed to get rid of its structured financing line of business (where all of these “loans” were created). Bank management noted that the decision to get rid of the structured financing business would reduce annual earnings by 10 cents a share. The bank had previously reported annual earnings of $5.21 per share. In addition, the bank had to accept the appointment of an outside monitor whose role, among other things, would be to review the bank's compliance with the settlement. Strategically, the bank had already reduced its emphasis on corporate lending (having suffered heavy losses in 2002) in favour of an increased focus on earnings from branch banking operations. At the end of 2003, CIBC was still owed $213 million by Enron. There were many additional Enron-related lawsuits pending against the bank, but the bank announced that the lawsuits were without merit. The bank had insurance against many of these claims and noted that it planned to vigorously defend itself. In 2005, the bank settled a lawsuit with institutional investors, paying $2.4 billion, again setting a standard for the size of the settlement. Then in 2009, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) challenged the bank regarding the tax deductibility of the payment. In Note 20 to CIBC's annual financial statements for the year ending October 31, 2017, relating to the subject of income taxes, the bank updated the outstanding issue. CIBC stated that the Tax Court of Canada trial on the deductibility of the Enron payments was scheduled to begin in 2018. As well, CIBC stated that, should it successfully defend its tax filing position in its entirety, the bank would recognize an additional accounting tax benefit of $231 million and taxable refund interest of approximately $198 million. Should CIBC fail to defend its position in its entirety, the bank would incur an additional tax expense of approximately $820 million and non-deductible interest of approximately $157 million.

Discuss any financial reporting issues relating to CIBC's 2003 and 2017 financial statements. Use the conceptual framework noted in Chapter 2 for the analysis.

Answer 1

Refer the below images for the above mentioned question, in a detailed way of explanation.
Answer: Note finantial reporting also by that the of bank is the geverned not only by 444P (IFRS) but Canadien of Finanüal the Bank ACt and office Institutions (OSFI). conceptual andyrs only. the Superin tendent dis cossion below is the The meant to yeflect Overview: CÍBC respect to its aored money lautuits . Precavious past position Not only additional with dealings Enyon but it has with Enyon . is it SHill OSeys petential pla intitfs, will the inclede who will ose potential and ersting determine financal bank can to Statementt Settle the whe ther if they lose . COurt alloged Statements bank tawsoit The the afterd be osed undely the may also profited Cores to see if in the Un scroplous deatings additional ri(KS through This Situation EnYon. Presents with for the audit - Canedion banis, SFRS is a Being a Constraint. poblic and Reco mmen da tions . Analy sif the $80 mittron fine în the Issue : present How to 2003 financial Statements - item - loss u nosoal Expenise The mag nitude of this loss may nt be seen as * The Soch that it Shoold loss is cnu sal Since it be argued be sepayately discdosed . t s the larged settlement of it Ikind in may vesult of a that it was a management dec sion: Canada. Management Chose to be involued in more aggresive structored financing buriness - the These fore, this was an ordinary cest of deing business.

un usual item - loss Expen se. The loss is a typical and înfrequent, → The fact the segulatory that CĪBC and banus are Since Canadian authorities legd to the Other thet'r won may the thet Case concusion feirly Corservative and rormally banıc wes complicit Some how in the Envon deception (i.e, Should are not Subject to there Fypes of regulatory inves tigations- bankes CIBC and other are advising Enyon have uas accounting and ehy ?) pastripatid in how + Manogement might highlight this loss as being beyond to EnYon want these troasactions their Control - > other. → perhaps presented as discon tinued business operations The structured financing opevahions loss Culd be the part of the Con sidered a separate component loith Separate and As, might vuali fy and burness operations be seen to may and pascel of bss the be part discon finued opedations. the → other. Conclusion the amount be Shown Separately Should so users may see impact of Shown as part the the the Envon that Settlements . could be it dis lontinued perhaps opexations provided Ir does the Criteria that met Qre Structured financing group, long er type of cost of the tast opera ting reflect Lwill the bank be that and given no operating Chould line of basiness, this in that hot be recurring.

CA 501 CIBC (continued) : finan üal Issue : in 2003 recei vables valoation of the Enron Statements : write down foft Leave as is Enron banıcYopt is → Bank has likely alveady assessed the cullectibility and feel that the > Many Suing Enyon heetiheod people ave and there fore the most amoonts of being able the receivables iS (ollect through the vecoverable ave bank Yuptey procedings- remote . better picture of harm done by Enson . -- Gives a - other. CEBC to the other. * în Conclosion, it is more Conser vahve to write oft the receivables. En Von i ssue of how a ccount for the a dditional to The potential may also be of in losses Concern . lawsuits Lawsoite trcely Should be accrued. which are that mealurable to The banik auditor are result in this regar d. lowyers Consut ig Should Should Sitoohion that ensure The The diselosed notes for predichve porposes. appropriotely Jeast in the

potential additional liabiity tax Statements 2017 finanial in Recognize liabilitng additional for Do not recognize Liabily potential tares has tolcen » At this point i Uncleay the amount of setlement as a tar a liability the as to whether dedoction. CR+ has Che leage d erists cor) not. this. is accrued y ît the amoont → This is a provision. ie, the it may prejudice the with CRA : Case banık have a lio bitny it may CRA disallows the deduchion, the other. CIBC woold accYue if the proba ble and peycut meajura ble . amant is measuya ble The deductible tar rate). (being the amoont times the other it s difficdt Conc lusion * În to Say how this determine Should bank woold treated have to The be whether, best judgement, and in thay in Conjonction a liability exist - with their lawyess and tax accoontants Quditors would rey on the and er pertise evidence The lowyers and of the tax.