Refer to the sample cap table in Exhibit 5 of the Financing Entrepreneurial Ventures reading. If the seed round had taken place at a $2 million post-money valuation—but every other round happened according to the terms described in Exhibit 5—who would be better off and who would be worse off (in terms of their ownership percentages of the company)?
Seed Round post money valuation = $ 2 million
Amount funded by the Angel Investors = $250,000
So, Value of Team (pre-money) = $2 million - $250,000 = $1,750,000
So, Equity of Team = 1750000/2000000 = 87.5%
Equity of Angel investor = 12.5%
Similarly.
Series A Funding post money valuation =$5 million
$1 million investment by VC1
Out of $4 Million pre-money valuation ,Share of Angel =12.5% or $500,000 , share of team 87.5% or $3,500,000
So, after Series A round,
Equity of Team =$3,500,000/$5,000,000 = 70%
Equity of Angel = $500,000/$5,000,000 = 10%
Equity of VC1= $1 million/$5 million = 20%
Series B Funding post money valuation =$20 million
$4 million investment by VC2
Out of $16 Million pre-money valuation ,Share of Angel =10% or $1.6 million , share of team 70% or $11.2 million, Share of VC1 = 20% or $3.2 million
So, after Series B round,
Equity of Team =$11.2 million /$20 million = 56%
Equity of Angel = $1.6 million/$20 million = 8%
Equity of VC1= $3.2 million/$20 million = 16%
Equity of VC2 = $4 million/$20 million = 20%
On comparison with the original situation presented in the table, it can be said that Only the Founders (Team) were better off, VC1 and VC2 had the same situation but the Angel was worse off.
From the available options, the 1st option : Only the founders would be better off is correct
Refer to the sample cap table in Exhibit 5 of the Financing Entrepreneurial Ventures reading. If...