If we simply read a report of a poll, how can we know if the poll is reliable? What criteria do we use to analyze them
In a period of rapidly advancing technology and falling costs for computers, long-distance telephone service, and statistical software, it is easier than ever for start-up companies to get into the polling business. Because most polling now takes place on the telephone, it is cheap and easy for someone who wants to get into the polling business to buy a sample, write a short questionnaire for a Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) application, buy interviewing services from a field house, and receive a report based on the marginals for each question and a limited set of cross-tabulations.
Many polling organizations embrace new technology as a way to cut costs and speed data collection. Some new technologies also make it possible to collect more types of data. Web-based surveys, for example, can employ visual or audio stimuli that are not possible with other questionnaire designs, making them an excellent way to evaluate political commercials, especially when applied in a full experimental design. Many organizations have also turned to Web-based surveys to reduce the turnaround time between the design of a questionnaire and the start of data analysis and production of the first report of results.
Applied inappropriately, however, this technology offers several potential pitfalls for data quality. First and foremost are sampling issues related to respondent selection. Pollsters obtain respondents in three ways. They take "volunteers" who self-select themselves to answer generally available questionnaires on a Web site. They recruit volunteers, sometimes for a single survey and sometimes for a panel from which subsequent samples will be drawn. And they use a probability sample to select respondents on the telephone and supply Internet access to those who need it.
Because the availability of Web connections is not uniformly or randomly distributed in society, the existence of a “digital divide” can introduce one source of bias in volunteer samples. This technique, for example, tends to produce samples that are more Republican and with more conservative leanings, as we have seen in such varied circumstances as post-debate polls in 2000 and more general public policy assessments since. The resulting bias tends to favor the current Bush administration and could work against a Democratic administration. Other possible problems include fatigue from the requirement to respond to periodic and frequent surveys to maintain panel status—a requirement that could even lead, in some circumstances, to “professional” respondents. More research needs to be done on these issues, but at a minimum a poll consumer ought to know about respondent recruitment and selection for Web-based surveys.
Pollsters must also contend with the rise of cell phones. Despite the increasing penetration of these devices in the United States (approaching 75 percent), fewer than 5 percent of Americans rely solely on a cell phone. But that share is growing—and presenting pollsters with a new set of problems. First, cell phone exchanges have no general directory, and they are excluded from samples that most public polling firms can buy. Second, people who rely on cell phones are more mobile than the rest of the population, and many use phones provided by their business. If, as is likely, the geographical correspondence between the phones’ assigned area codes and their owners’ place of residence is poor, it may or may not be an issue for firms conducting surveys with national samples, but it could be for those conducting state or local surveys and effectively dialing out of their target area.
One further problem linked to new technology is telephone caller ID. This screening device, which alerts households to who is calling, makes it possible to avoid calls from “out of their area” or from unfamiliar numbers. In response to citizens’ pleas for protection from telemarketers, the federal government is moving to develop a “do not call” list. Pollsters need not honor such list membership now, but future abuses by pollsters or telemarketers could change that. This technology too is exerting downward pressure on response rates.
*The purpose of a poll is to identify how a population feels about an issue or candidate. Many polling companies and news outlets use statisticians and social scientists to design accurate and scientific polls and to reduce errors. A scientific poll will try to create a representative and random sample to ensure the responses are similar to what the actual population of an area believes. Scientific polls also have lower margins of error, which means they better predict what the overall public or population thinks. Most polls are administered through phones, online, or via social media. Even in scientific polls, issues like timing, social pressure, lack of knowledge, and human nature can create results that do not match true public opinion. Polls can also be used as campaign devices to try to change a voter’s mind on an issue or candidate.
If we simply read a report of a poll, how can we know if the poll...
can someone explain simply how to read a binary file and how to write to a binary file in java please
As we all know, there's a lot of information in the news about what's healthy for us and what's not. Scientists use the Scientific Method to determine whether data acquired in laboratory experiments is valid and to direct them to the next question that needs to be asked. As consumers, we can use the Scientific Method as well, not as a scientist but as an educated consumer to help us sort through the information being presented and make determinations about...
A) What can we predict that there are some problems in simply supported beam bridge and how do we improve or prevent the situation? B) How to conclude the significance of the simply supported beam bridge construction and what is the implication of it? C) How to summarize the impact of simply supported beam applied on the bridge as shown in figure below like how the load are been used and how the support functioned on the bridge. D) Why...
Q1 (10 pts): Simply explain the mechanical property terms of stress, strain, and strength. Why do we need to define such properties, can't we just simply rely on what experiments show? By definition, are those reliable properties, or due to nature of experiments we need to modify them?
Who were the Anasazi, where did they live, and how do we know what we do about them (what kind of evidance do we have left behind) ? According to fared Daimond , what is chaco's massage ?
We want to know if whether you read fiction or non-fiction affects whether or not you use e-books or print books. We sample 130 people and ask them whether the last book they read was fiction or non-fiction, and whether or not it was an e-book or a print book. We found that there were 60 had read a non-fiction book in the last year, and of those 60, 40 had read a print book. Of the 70 who had...
Not quite sure what to do on this one. I know how to use a normal distribution table, but doesn't this question require a confidence level or do I assume one and compare an alternative hypothesis(tow-tail). Find the value of the z statistic in the following example: in the 1990-s a Gallup poll was run to determine how many people shop on-line. (Today, almost everyone does, but back then, it was not the case). Test the claim that the proportion...
6. A recent poll asked 700 Americans. “How many books did you read in the last year? Results of the poll indicated that t= 12 books and s = 8 books. (a) Construct a 99% confidence interval for the number of books read. (b) Suppose the standard deviation of 8 books is the population standard deviation instead of the sample standard deviation). What would be the confidence interval in that case?
Epistemology addresses the question of how we know, that is, how do we know reality. In your opinion is an inductive or deductive approach to knowing reality better?
Suppose we want to read in a file called "input.txt". We can do the following. File f = new File(input.txt); Scanner s = new Scanner (f); ... We know that Scanner constructor will throw a FileNotFoundException when the file does not exist. Since we already created a file object "f", the file does exist. So why do we need to either throw the exception or do try/catch block to in order to have the program continue? Thanks.