Should cost of care be considered in determining value of life saving treatment for patients?
Since our healthcare does not have universal coverage; as in countries like Canada, the cost of care should be considered in determining value of life-saving treatment for patients as we have to establish access to all, even those who are poor and even those who are unemployed and they have to pay out of pocket should have access to the lifesaving treatment. Reducing cost is a way to establish equality in terms of access.
Should cost of care be considered in determining value of life saving treatment for patients?
Should the U.S. focus health policies on prevention of health care or the treatment of patients who already have disease? What are the pros and cons of each, of having a policy geared toward prevention versus having one geared toward rescue/treatment?
Physicians are often hesitant to discuss end-of-life care with their patients. Do you think the end-of-life care should be part of all patient care? Do you think the end-of-life care should be part of only the elderly and frail patients? Should you have end-of-life care discussions with children or teenagers who are seriously ill?
Should patients and their families be required to pay for the treatment that physicians find as medically futile care? And should this determination be made by the insurance company, the government, the patient’s doctor, or some combination thereof?
proving individualized care for patients according to their needs is considered
Ethically, health-care providers should refuse all patients that do not have the ability to pay. refuse patients when the practice is already oversubscribed. only refuse patients when the provider has announced his or her retirement. refer all low-income patients to a charitable organization instead of providing any health care to these patients. It is never acceptable to withhold information from patients for fear they will refuse treatment. True False Knowledge that, if revealed, would harm not only the client but...
The notion that quality of life is a subjective experience assumes that: a)patients themselves may provide the most valid assessment of quality of life b)only physiological functioning should be considered in QOL measures c)it is impossible to develop valid and reliable measures of QOL d)QOL is independent of changes in chronic illness and its treatment
Factors considered in determining an intangible asset's useful life include all of the following except A. the amortization method used. B. any provisions for renewal or extension of the asset's legal life. C. the expected use of the asset. D. any legal or contractual provisions that may limit the useful life.
Do patients receiving end-of-life care achieve a quality of life from spiritual and psychological interventions when compared to patients who do not receive the interventions within one year? And what are some barriers?
explain the patient factors that should be considered when a patients is treated holistically
For patients with liver failure due to cirrhosis liver, transplantation may be the only possible treatment. How is the care for the patient undergoing liver transplantation different from the care of a regular surgical patient? What patient teaching is needed after a patient receives a liver transplant? Should the patient with alcoholic cirrhosis be a candidate for a liver transplant? Should government funds be used in the care of patients with cirrhosis who continue to consume alcohol?