Question

The City of Boston has contacted your company about privatizing a division of its public healthcare services. Parts of the arrangement would be the receipt of government funding, having some operations take place in government facilities, and closely working with city officials to create and implement programs. Currently, your company adheres to strict background checks and random drug testing of all potential and active employees. Any active employees found to have negative marks on their background or who fail a drug test are immediately terminated. Assuming you decide to enter into the privatization agreement, weigh the options to keep your company in compliance with the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

Answer 1

Answer - The equal-protection clause under the Fourteenth Amendment denies any state to preclude measure up to insurance from claiming the laws to any person inside its ward; it ensures minority gatherings, for example, African Americans and ladies from segregation by state and neighbourhood government. Three tests related to segregation incorporate the reasonable-basis test, strict-scrutiny test, and suspect classifications. The reasonable-basis test, when connected by courts, grants unequal treatment for specific laws. It might be esteemed protected if its motivation is held to be "sensibly" identified with an authentic government intrigue. A strict-investigation test is connected to laws including racial or ethnic order. At the end of the day, it takes out race or ethnicity as a lawful order when it puts certain gatherings off guard. Finally, the intermediate scrutiny test applies to laws that endeavor sexual orientation order; it restricts sex discrimination except if it serves a critical goal and is considerably identified with the destinations accomplishment. I will run a test and if any employee found to have negative marks on the background or who fails a drug test will be immediately terminated.