Which of the following types of contracts falls under the Statute of Frauds?
Contracts for the sale of an interest in personal property.
Contracts that can be performed within a year from the date of their formation.
Contracts for the sale of goods.
Contracts for the sale of goods for $500 or more.
Option 4
Statute of Fraud is a legal entity that requires to be executed in writing and should cover the basic conditions and terms of the parties agreement.
Usually Contracts like transfer or sale of land, sale of goods over $500, related to marriage, those which cannot be fully completed within a year of signing, surety contracts would fall under the Statute of Frauds.
Which of the following types of contracts falls under the Statute of Frauds? Contracts for the...
Which statement about the statute of frauds is true? OA. All contracts must be in writing in order to be enforced. O B. Contracts for the sale of goods for $500 or more must be in writing in order to be enforced с.contracts for the sale of land for $500 or more must be in writing in order to be enforced. All employment contracts must be in writing in order to be enforced.
The Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable. Which of the following contracts is required to be in writing to be enforceable? a.A contract for the sale of farmland b.A contract for the sale of an antique c.A contract of employment d.A contract for the building of a house on farmland (give explaination)
70. The Statute of Frauds writing requirement applies to both guarantor and collateral contracts. Answers: True False 71. Any contract that cannot be fully performed within one year must be evidenced by a writing because of poor human memory and the natural evolution of individual bias. Answers: True False 72. Once a debt is discharged in bankruptcy it is not legally enforceable and therefore can never be resurrected. Answers: True False 73. Contracts subject to the Statute of Frauds must...
Some contracts must be in writing and signed to be enforceable. Contracts that are covered by the statute of frauds include: Group of answer choices all of the other answer choices contracts for the sale of goods valued at $500 or more promises to pay the debts of another person contracts that cannot be finished within a year contracts for the sale of land
Question 5 The Statute of Frauds requires which of the following contracts to be in writing? a. A contract to buy a watch for $100 b. A contract to buy a bicycle for $300 OC. A contract to buy a stereo for $499 d. All of the above Oe. None of the above
44. Agreements under the “Statute of Frauds” must: a. be in writing b. be for under $100.00 c. be on legal paper d. be notarized e. all of the above f. a and d only 45. An “illegal agreement” is one that will not be enforced because it violates: a. mirror reflection rule b. statutory law c. mutual rescission d. discord and satisfaction e. all of the above 46. The “parole evidence rule” related to contracts may refer to: a....
Question 3 5 pts Lori and Mike orally agree to several different contracts. The Statute oírFrauds will bar enforcement of an oral contract for O a primary obligation. O a sale of land. O a deal that will be performed within a year. O a sale of goods for $100.
14. The version of promissory estoppel in the Restatement (Second) of Contracts provides that if parties enter into an oral contract that should be in writing under the Statute of Frauds, the oral promise is enforceable against the promisor if certain conditions are met. Which of the following is NOT one of these conditions? A. the promise relied on the oral promise B. the reliance was foreseeable C. injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the oral promise D. the...
QUESTION 5 With regard to the element of reliance in a fraud claim, which of the following is NOT true? a. If the claim in issue was very outrageous and extravagant, the innocent party will have a harder time showing his or her reliance was justifiable. b. The reliance must have been justifiable. c. The innocent party does not have to prove he or she relied on the false fact; it is assumed because the fact is false. d. The...
A Question of Ethics-Statute of Frauds.Daniel Fox owned Fox & Lamberth Enterprises, Inc., a kitchen remodeling business. Fox leased a building from Carl Hussong. When Fox planned to close his business, Craftsmen Home Improvement, Inc., expressed an interest in buying his assets. Fox set a price of $50,000. Craftsmen's owners agreed and gave Fox a list of the desired items and a "Bill of Sale" that set the terms for payment. Craftsmen expected to negotiate a new lease with Hussong...