Show work in order to receive credit. (P v Q) ^ (~ P л~ Q) is...

Question

Question

Show work in order to receive credit. (P v Q) ^ (~ P л~ Q) is (or is not) a tautology using truth tables 11. Show that

Answer 1

Answer #1

ANSWER:

THE STATEMENT IS (OR IS NOT) A TAUTOLOGY USING TRUTH TABLES;

(PꓦQ)ꓥ (~Pꓥ~Q)

THIS STATEMENT IS NOT A TAUTOLOGY STATEMENT BECAUSE IN TAUTOLOGY STATEMENT ALL THE TRUE (T) COME IN LAST COLUMN SO IS NOT A TAUTOLOGY STATEMENT

Answer 2

Similar Homework Help Questions

Discrete Math I'm confused with the questions listed below. Can you please solve and explain in...

Discrete Math I'm confused with the questions listed below. Can you please solve and explain in detail? how it transforms one to the other to get the answer? Using propositional logic properties and other logical equivalences (not truth tables), prove the following statements: 1. (p Vq) V (p V -q) is a tautology 2. ((p-+ r) Л (q r) Л (pv q)) _+ r is a tautology 3. (pVq) Л (-р Л q) is a contradiction 4. (1-p) Λ (p...
In order to receive full credit on these problems, you must clearly show all your work....

In order to receive full credit on these problems, you must clearly show all your work. An answer without justification will receive 0 credit. 1. (10 marks) Consider the subspace V = Span 11 [2] 5] - 1 [5] -71 [1] doo (a) Find a basis for V and V. (b) Find dim(V) and dim(V+). (c) Find a matrix B satisfying V = null(B). 2. (2 marks) True or False: If E is an elementary matrix, then nullity(A) = nullity(EA)....
Prove or disprove (without using a truth table): (p^q) rightarrow (q rightarrow p) is a tautology....

Prove or disprove (without using a truth table): (p^q) rightarrow (q rightarrow p) is a tautology. Prove that the contrapositive holds (without using a truth table), that is that the followi holds: p rightarrow q identicalto q rightarrow p

Show that q → (p ∧ q) ∨ (¬p ∧¬q) →p is a tautology using De-Morgan...

Show that q → (p ∧ q) ∨ (¬p ∧¬q) →p is a tautology using De-Morgan Laws (( with showing the steps )) In (Discrete Structures course)
2. (a) Show that (PVQ) + R is not logically equivalent to (P + R) V(Q...

2. (a) Show that (PVQ) + R is not logically equivalent to (P + R) V(Q + R) using a truth table. (b) Is (PAQ) → R logically equivalent to (P + R) A( Q R )? If so, use a truth table to establish this. If not, show that it is false.
In order to prove this proposition: (P (x)-+ Q (z)) <-(R (z) Л Q (z))you must prove which of the following propositi...

In order to prove this proposition: (P (x)-+ Q (z)) <-(R (z) Л Q (z))you must prove which of the following propositions? Select all (if any) that apply. B) (Q (z) л P(x)) (R (z) Q (z)) F) All of the Above G) None of The Above In order to prove this proposition: (P (x)-+ Q (z))

Prove the following is a tautology (without using a truth table) [(p →q) (q + r)]...

Prove the following is a tautology (without using a truth table) [(p →q) (q + r)] → (p → r)
please explain/show all work! Part 11 **All work must be shown to receive credit. Partial credit...

please explain/show all work! Part 11 **All work must be shown to receive credit. Partial credit will be awarded where appropriate Q8 Write out the general term for the sequence ). 09 (a) By inspection determine the following sequence is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing b) Prove your answer in partla) Q10 Determine the limits of the following sequences given the general term: (b) Q-Inn + 1) - In(n) I) Qe-ne- 11 Determine what the following series converges to using...
QUESTION 2 a. Let p and q be the statements. i Construct the truth table for...

QUESTION 2 a. Let p and q be the statements. i Construct the truth table for (-p V q) ^ q and (-p) v q. What do you notice about the truth tables? Based on this result, a creative student concludes that you can always interchange V and A without changing the truth table. Is the student, right? ii. Construct the truth tables for (-p VG) A p and (-p) v p. What do you think of the rule formulated...

(40 pts) Consider the transitivity of the biconditional: ((P HQ ) ^ ( Q R ))...

(40 pts) Consider the transitivity of the biconditional: ((P HQ ) ^ ( Q R )) → ( P R ). a. Show that this argument is valid by deriving a tautology from it, a la section 2.1. You may use logical equivalences (p. 35), the definition of biconditional, and the transitivity of conditional: (( P Q) ^ (Q→ R)) → (P + R). Show that this argument is valid using a truth table. Please circle the critical lines. C....