Question

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1150 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 77 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean range of the manufacturer's cordless telephone and μ2 be the true mean range of the competitor's cordless telephone. Use a significance level of α=0.01 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed. compute the t test statistic, determine the rejecting null Ho, and state the test conclusion

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 13 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1090 feet with a standard deviation of 21 feet. A sample of 9 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1120 feet with a standard deviation of 20 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1110 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let u be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 10 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 19 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 33 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 99 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 13501350 feet with a standard deviation of 4242 feet. A sample of 1717 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 12801280 feet with a standard deviation of 2828 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is great...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1190 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 13 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1060 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1050 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • Need step 3 only. A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900...

    Need step 3 only. A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900 MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 15 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1280 feet with a standard deviation of 21 feet. A sample of 10 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 40 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let...

  • A1A Tires claims that its tires last longer than tires manufactured by its main competitor, YYZ...

    A1A Tires claims that its tires last longer than tires manufactured by its main competitor, YYZ Tires. A consumer group studied the lifespans of tires manufactured by each manufacturer. The lifespans of a random sample of 10 tires from each manufacturer, in thousands of miles, are recorded. Assume that the population standard deviation of the lifespan for tires manufactured by A1A Tires is 3 thousand miles, while the population standard deviation of the lifespan for tires manufactured by YYZ Tires...

  • A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime of its lithium batteries is 1100 hours but a...

    A manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime of its lithium batteries is 1100 hours but a group of homeowners believe their battery life is different than this manufacturer's claim. A homeowner selects 35 of these batteries and finds the mean lifetime to be 1080 hours with a standard deviation of 80 hours. Test the manufacturer's claim. Use a 10% level of significance and the p-value approach. Round the test statistic to the nearest thousandth. Need hypothesis testing, values of symbols,...

  • uestion A1A Tires claims that its tires last longer than tires manufactured by its main competitor,...

    uestion A1A Tires claims that its tires last longer than tires manufactured by its main competitor, YYZ Tires. A consumer group studied the lifespans of tires manufactured by each manufacturer. The lifespans of a random sample of 10 tires from each manufacturer, in thousands of miles, are recorded. Assume that the population standard deviation of the lifespan for tires manufactured by A1A Tires is 3 thousand miles, while the population standard deviation of the lifespan for tires manufactured by YYZ...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT