Question
Need step 3 only.
A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900 MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading
Step 2 of 4: Compute the value of the ftest statistic Round your answer to three decimal places. Answer(How to Enter) 2 Point
Step 3 of 4: Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis Ho Round your answer to three decimal places Answe
Step 4 of 4: State the tests conclusion. Answer 2 Points Tables Keypad rev Reject Null Hypothesis Fail to Reject Null Hypoth
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Answer: Step 3: - Test statistic ander Ho to I t= m tnta 2 01-22 spLIU ni nz - tcritical = tnith- 2 2 I Here ni=15 D 2=10 a=0

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Need step 3 only. A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1120 feet with a standard deviation of 20 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1110 feet with a standard deviation of 25 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let u be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 10 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1250 feet with a standard deviation of 31 feet. A sample of 19 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 33 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 99 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 13501350 feet with a standard deviation of 4242 feet. A sample of 1717 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 12801280 feet with a standard deviation of 2828 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 13 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1090 feet with a standard deviation of 21 feet. A sample of 9 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1030 feet with a standard deviation of 42 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is great...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 18 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1230 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 13 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1190 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ 1 be the true...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 12 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1150 feet with a standard deviation of 27 feet. A sample of 77 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1100 feet with a standard deviation of 23 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater...

    A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 13 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1060 feet with a standard deviation of 37 feet. A sample of 18 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1050 feet with a standard deviation of 39 feet. Do the results support the manufacturer's claim? Let μ1 be the true mean...

  • An automobile manufacturer claims that their car has a 56.7 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing...

    An automobile manufacturer claims that their car has a 56.7 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing firm has been contracted to test the MPG for this car. After testing 14 cars they found a mean MPG of 56.6 with a standard deviation of 1.1. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.1 level that the cars underperform the manufacturer's MPG rating? Assume the population distribution is approximately normal. Step 1 of 5: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Answer 2 Points...

  • To step Tro 07:30 A salesman for a new manufacturer of cellular phones claims not only...

    To step Tro 07:30 A salesman for a new manufacturer of cellular phones claims not only that they cost the retailer less but also that the percentage of defective cellular phones found among his products. (Pi ). will be no higher than the percentage of defectives found in a competitor's line. (P2). To test this statement, the retailer took a random sample of 130 of the salesman's cellular phones and 105 of the competitor's cellular phones. The retailer found that...

  • An automobile manufacturer claims that its van has a 36.2 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing...

    An automobile manufacturer claims that its van has a 36.2 miles/gallon (MPG) rating. An independent testing firm has been contracted to test the MPG for this van since it is believed that the van has an incorrect manufacturer's MPG rating. After testing 220 vans, they found a mean MPG of 36.0. Assume the variance is known to be 4.41. A level of significance of 0.05 will be used. Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT