a) if L1 is recognisable but not decidable, L2 is decidable but not recognisable, then prove L1 U L2 is undecidable?
b) if L1 is recognisable but not decidable, L2 is recognisable but not decidable, then prove L1 U L2 is undecidable?
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the answer.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.
a) if L1 is recognisable but not decidable, L2 is decidable but not recognisable, then prove...
For Language L1 and L2 prove or disprove (L1 union L2)*=L1* intersection L2*
Prove that If L1 is linear and L2 is regular, L1×L2 is a linear Language.
Given sigma={a, b} And languages L1, L2 contain in sigma^* I need to prove/disprove the following claim:
13. (1 point) Which of the following statement could be false where Lį and L2 are decidable lan- guages? A. Li · L2 is decidable. B. Li Lis undecidable. C. Lin L2 is decidable. D. LI U L2 is decidable. E. None of the above. 14. (1 point) Which of the following statement could be false where Lj is decidable and L2 is recognizable? A. Li · L2 is recognizable. B. Li · L2 is decidable. C. Lin L2 is...
Given sigma={a, b} And languages L1, L2 contain in sigma^* I need to prove/disprove the following claim:
2. If L1 and L2 are regular languages, which of the following are regular languages? Provide justification for your answers. a. L1 U L2 b. L1L2 c. L1 n L2
For each of the following statements, where L1, L2, and L are languages over some alphabet Σ, state whether it is true or false. Prove your answer. • ∀L,(∅ or L+) = L∗ • ∀L1,L2,(L1 or L2)∗ = (L2 or L1)∗
L1 and L2 are lists. L3 = L1 + L2 This is an example of mutation of L is this true or false?
Prove that polynomial-time reducibility is transitive: that is, if L1is polynomial-time-reducible to L2, and L2 is polynomial-time-reducible to L3, then L1 is polynomial-time-reducible to L3.
Let L1 = L(a∗baa∗) and L2 = L(aba∗). Find L1/L2.This is a Formal Languages and Automata question.