Evaluate the properties of the instrument (Survey) how would you revise or improve it and recommendations for further study.
The properties of the instrument (Survey) are, based on their Reliability and validity. Reliability is the ability to re.produce a result consistently, it measures the same outcome. Validity refers to the property of an instrument to measure exactly what it intended to measure and to create results that can be generalized.
An instrument should accurately and dependably measure what it ought to measure and the results must be consistent. The reliability of the survey can help you have a valid assessment, and the validity of the survey can make you confident in making a prediction.
In order to revise or improvise your Survey
Reliability
The results of the Cronbach’s alpha or the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 computations are generally used to compute the internal consistency of the test. This can be analyzed using a reliable statistical software application.
The inter-correlations of the items in the survey and if these items measure the same construct. A construct is a behaviour researcher seeks to measure in the study. This is often the independent variable used in the study
When the inter-correlations between the items increase, the Cronbach’s alpha value will increase as well.
If the value of Cronbach ’s alpha is less than .05, the items are considered poor and must be omitted. To improvise your survey your alpha value must be above .05.
Validity
There are many ways to measure the validity of the test and there different types of validity too. The most commonly used is the construct validity. The independent variable must be accurately defined.
The construct validity is measured using factor analysis and each sub-scale has a good inter-item correlation using Bivariate Correlation. The items are considered good if the p-value must be less than 0.05.
Evaluate the properties of the instrument (Survey) how would you revise or improve it and recommendations...
what recommendations would you make to improve performance potential in each of the firms? why? (philips vs matsushita)
Provide at least two recommendations that would improve efficiencies. Base your recommendations on the weekly chapter content?
Explain the Management philosophy of Patagonia. If you were CEO of Patagonia today would you revise this philosophy and if so how and & why and if not why not. Please explain what your key metrics would be to evaluate the success of executing this philosophy?
What are some literacy/numeracy issues in healthcare settings? What recommendations would you make to improve communication where literacy and numeracy limitations are evident?
Recommendations that would improve their consumer market segmentation and targeting (concentrated targeting strategy)
As a qualitative researcher, the person doing the study becomes the instrument of inquiry. How would you propose to discuss the researcher’s role in a qualitative study?
Consider the 10-minute lecture that you developed in the previous module. How would you revise this if delivering the content via distance methods? How would you promote student interaction. Would the evaluation methods differ?
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: What recommendations would you give to someone wanting to improve his or her cardiovascular health? Give reasoning for each recommendation. What recommendations would you give to someone wanting to improve his or her gastrointestinal health? Give reasoning for each recommendation.. please include links for your sources and proper grammar .Thank you
As part of a survey in your company to improve on performance by enhancing the use of technology in your company, you have been assigned as the head of IT to identify possible challenges and make suggestions and recommendations. Briefly present your response to management and explain your reasons.
Discuss/share examples of poorly written/inappropriate email messages sent to you. How would you revise such messages? If you have no personal examples to share, how can you increase readability of email messages?