Question

Discuss ethical implications that may arise for both sides of death penalty cases.

Discuss ethical implications that may arise for both sides of death penalty cases.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Those who oppose death penalty argue that every human being should have the right to life, even those who committed crimes. Capital punishment undermines human dignity. Furthermore, capital punishment discriminates based on income level to an extent because the chances of receiving death sentence is affected by whether or not the defendant can afford good lawyers.

In constraint, those The in favour of death penalty would debate that a person who commits a crime against another forfeits the other person’s right to life. Therefore, it is unjust for him/her to have the right to life if he/she deprived someone else’s right. Furthermore, life in prison costs more than a death row and so, from utilitarian perspective, the money can be used for other more important things.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Discuss ethical implications that may arise for both sides of death penalty cases.
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT