Q1. Ans:- As of now, the federal law, specifically the Civil rights Act of 1964, does not contain any legal option prohibiting employment descrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or identity.The Federal state has not enacted any bill so far seeking to include sexual orientation and identity to the list of protected rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Therefore Mr.Bart will not be able to challenge his firing based upon sexual orientation.
Q2.Ans:- The Pennsylvania law also does not contain any legal option which specifically prohibits employment descrimination sexual orientation or genderidentity.But as per the intervention of the Pennsylvania Human relation commission, the government agencies has announced that it would accepts claims or complaints of descrimination against homosexual people in employment.Further more than 45 muncipalities in Pennsylvania have passed ordinance to recognise sexual orientation or gender identity and prohibiting descrimination in employment based on the same. Therefore Mr.Bart will have the legal option under the Pennsylvania state law challenging his firing based upon sexual orientation or identity.
Notes :- The question challenching whether sexual orientation and gender identity are protected from discrimination is pending in the H'onble Supreme court, its decision will change the current status of LGBT people in Federal state including the Pennsylvania.
Bart is an employee of Gotcha Corp, a large corpotation located in Bart's state of residence....
Case 1 Shane Dawson, a male homosexual, worked for Entek International. Some of Dawson’s co-workers, including his supervisor, made derogatory comments about his sexual orientation. Dawson’s work deteriorated. He filed a complaint with Entek’s human resources department. Two days later, he was fired. State law made it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an individual based on sexual orientation. [Dawson v. Entek International, 630 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2011)] (See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.) (523, Miller)...
a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Couple” . Briefly summarize the case. b] Use as many specific concepts and contents from this course to develop your argument either in favor or against that Supreme Court ruling. c] Can you identify any direct and/or indirect violence associated with this conflict? Article: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to...
Read the following case:
Answer the questions accordingly:
PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE
EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine 666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012) OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE YOUNG: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") brought this action on behalf of two serv- ers, Katrina Shisler and Michelle Powell, who were em- ployed at an International House of Pancakes franchise in Racine, Wisconsin (the "Racine IHOP"), alleging that the servers were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of...
Write 3 paragraphs for reflection and should be do the following: 1. In first paragraph, Summarize the article (attached below). (Don't plagiarism from article. Please use your own words to summarize article below) 2. In second paragraph, Connect the article with one of those "biological variation in modern humans" or "cultural anthropology" or "how identity and worldview are deeply influenced by cultural upbringing" or "human pre-history, human social interaction, and human cultures". Be specific about the connections you make. 3....
Read “Instituionalizing our Demise: America vs Multiculturalism” by
Roger Kimball on pg 268 and “Reinventing America” Call for a new
national indentity” by Elizabeth Martinez on pg 275. Create a
double entry notebook for each reading selection It should be
atleast five observation and responses.
wric 268 PART 2 essay pro. exactly how and why their authors disagree. Instead of with parties in conflict as mediators do, you will nt of view designed to appeal to both sides, mediatn posing...
Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170
words:
Q: Compare the assumptions of physician-centered and
collaborative communication. How is the caregiver’s role different
in each model? How is the patient’s role different?
Answer: Physical-centered communication involves the specialists
taking control of the conversation. They decide on the topics of
discussion and when to end the process. The patient responds to the
issues raised by the caregiver and acts accordingly. On the other
hand, Collaborative communication involves a...