In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that...

Question

Question

In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that a gatekeeper determine th

Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text

Answer 1

Answer #1

Answer:-

The Federal Rules of Evidence govern the admission of scientific evidence in a trial held in federal court. They require the trial judge to act as a gatekeeper before admitting the evidence, determining that the evidence is scientifically valid and relevant to the case at hand. Daubert v.

Hence, the correct option is Trial Judge.

Add a comment

Answer 2

Similar Homework Help Questions

The U.S. Supreme Court Case that established "separate but equal" was A. Brown v. Board of...

The U.S. Supreme Court Case that established "separate but equal" was A. Brown v. Board of Education (1954) B. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) C. Roe v. Wade (1973) D. Miranda v. AZ (1966) E. Scott v. Sanford (1856)
Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four...

Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four alternative courses of action which would have helped the client not get into the "problem. with evaluation.
In a 1992 case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled...

In a 1992 case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that when a substance in food causes injury to someone consuming the food, just because the substance was natural to the food will not bar recovery against the seller of the food. If, in a 2019 case involving a consumer’s injury caused by a fish bone in a bowl of fish chowder, the court follows the decision in Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the...

Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint...

Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint of the 6th Amendment to tie it back to the Ist! Amendment from last week. Look at the case summary and facts for Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70,127 S. Ct. 649 (2006) A defendant in a murder trial is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury if courtroom spectators wear buttons showing a picture of the deceased. Facts Matthew...
In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the Supreme Court: A. Reaffirmed the “physical presence” requirement and...

In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the Supreme Court: A. Reaffirmed the “physical presence” requirement and held that the State’s efforts to require defendants to collect sales tax violated Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. B. Held that because the defendants had no employees or real property in the State, they could not be required to collect sales tax consistent with the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. C. Overruled prior precedent and held that the defendants were subject to...
22. Early in the trial of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., the attorneys engag...

22. Early in the trial of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., the attorneys engage in voir dire. This is a. b. c. A hearing before the judge to determine the legal issues to be argued. A review by both attorneys of the evidentiary exhibits. A proceeding for selection of jurors. d. Opening statements 23. Irma files a suit against Jim. In order to obtain a favorable jury verdict, Irma must prove her case a. Beyond a reasonable doubt....

Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate"...

Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate" written by Rob Normey. According to the article, which of the following statements is FALSE? Select one: a. The concept of the rule of law and the need to strictly comply with it is often presented with a flourish in legal and political debates. b. The article celebrated the Mackeigan v. Hickman (1989) and R. v Westendorp cases c. One essential aspect of the...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...

In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that...

Homework Answers

Add Answer to:
In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that...

Post as a guest

Earn Coins

The U.S. Supreme Court Case that established "separate but equal" was A. Brown v. Board of...

Case analysis: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain 542 U.S. 692 (2004) United States Supreme Court please list four...

In a 1992 case entitled Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc., the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled...

Please Help me Answer The 3 questions on the Last Page Now !!!!! One more viewpoint...

In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., the Supreme Court: A. Reaffirmed the “physical presence” requirement and...

22. Early in the trial of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., the attorneys engag...

Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate"...

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...

In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that...

Homework Answers

Add Answer to: In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that...

Post as a guest

Earn Coins

Add Answer to:
In the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court advocated that...