Q.2) Discuss the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. What is the importance of this game in economics?
Prisoners dilemma is one of the most important concepts in game theory. It is a paradox. In prisoners dilemma, two individuals acts in their own self interest that is they both try to make decisions by protecting themselves at the expense of the other player.
It was given by Albert W Tucker and is a non cooperative game as both the players will not cooperate with each other because the risk of the other person deflecting is high.
We take the example of a policeman and 2 prisoners who are held for a crime.
The policeman investigates and puts a situation in front of the two prisoners.
If they confess the crime, they will be jailed for 5 years each. On the other hand, if both deny they will be free to go.
If one confesses and the other deny, the one who denies will be jailed for 10 years while the one who confesses will be jailed for 5 years.
The prisoners do not know what the other is going to choose and will always try to maximize their own benefit. If they both cooperate they both can deny and be set free. But since they don't know about each other and if one of them confesses the other will have to go to jail for 10 years. So keeping in mind their own benefit the best strategy for both the prisoners will be to confess the crime.
If prisoner 1 confesses whereas prisoner 2 denies, 2 will be jailed for 10 years whereas prisoner 1 will be jailed for 5 years.
On the other hand, if prisoner 1 denies and prisoner 2 confesses, prisoner 1 will be jailed for 10 years and prisoner 2 for 5 years.
If both of them confess the time will be 5 years each. Since this is a non cooperative game, both the prisoners will confess the crime in order to protect themselves and will go to jail for 5 years.
Prisoners dilemma is an important concept in economics as it helps in understanding how to strike a balance between cooperation and competition. It is highly useful for strategic decision making. It is widely used in an oligopoly market where there are 2-10 sellers in the market. It helps in making strategies best for the seller and they can meet their own targets with this.
Q.2) Discuss the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. What is the importance of this game in economics?
Consider the following prisoner’s dilemma Player 1 Share Fight Share 15,15 5,18 Player 2 Fight 18,5 7,7 a. Identify each players Nash strategies. b. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? If yes what is it? c. Does this game have dominant strategy equilibrium? If yes what is it? d What makes it a Prisoner’s dilemma? e. What is the incentive to cheat? f. What is the social cost of cheating? g. In a repeated game what is the value...
a) Explain what is meant by the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” game. Do players have a dominant strategy in this game? b) Create an example of a pay-off matrix for such a game c) Will the Nash equilibrium of this game result in the socially optimal outcome? *Explain why/why not* Your answer will be marked according to the following categories. PART A PART B PART C General Clarity of Explanations
(Consider This) The prisoner’s dilemma is genrally demonstrates through. A. the kinked-demand model B. game theory C. monopolistic competition D. a tightly knit cartel
In the “prisoner’s dilemma” duopoly game, if each firm chooses the price level that is most profitable no matter what the other company does, then Select one: a. the companies can end up colluding, pricing high to keep profits up. b. the companies end up pricing low, leading to very low profits. c. one company can gain large profits while the other suffers from low profits. d. There is no clear result. e. None of the above is correct.
In the “prisoner’s dilemma” duopoly game, if each firm chooses the price level that is most profitable no matter what the other company does, then a. the companies can end up colluding, pricing high to keep profits up. b. the companies end up pricing low, leading to very low profits. c. one company can gain large profits while the other suffers from low profits. d. There is no clear result. e. None of the above is correct.
n an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma (such as a repeated price war): Group of answer choices repeated defection is the only equilibrium. there are two different equilibria: repeated defection and repeated cooperation. repeated cooperation is the only equilibrium. each player cooperates in the early stages, but defects near the end of the game. there is no stable equilibrium strategy for either player.
1. Represent each of the following strategies for an infinitely repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma game in a diagram. (a) Choose C in period 1 and after any history in which the other player chose C except, possibly, the previous period; choose D after any other history. (That is, punishment is grim, but its initiation is delayed by one period.) (b) Choose C in period 1 and after any history in which the other player chose D in at most one period;...
What is game theory and how is it applied in business decision making. (b) What is the dominant strategy, prisoner’s dilemma game, battle of the sexes game
Review Chapter 15, Table 15.4, Prisoner Dilemma. Suppose the game starts with both Jesse and Frank planning to “Stay Mum” in the lower right cell. Discuss how each player would evaluate the situation and decide whether to change decisions. If each player makes decisions to minimize the penalty, in which cell will this game end? Is there a Nash equilibrium? This is from book fifth edition managerial economics.
Determine whether there exists a strategic game which is equivalent to the Prisoner’s Dilemma with the following property: The payoff functions of players are such that what- ever action profile(s) is(are) we are given, player 1’s payoffs are greater than player 2’s payoff.