Question

Consider the following prisoner’s dilemma          ...

Consider the following prisoner’s dilemma

                                                                                   Player 1

                                                                            Share              Fight

                                                       Share             15,15              5,18

                               Player 2          Fight              18,5              7,7

              a. Identify each players Nash strategies.

              b. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? If yes what is it?

              c. Does this game have dominant strategy equilibrium? If yes what is it?

              d What makes it a Prisoner’s dilemma?

              e. What is the incentive to cheat?

              f. What is the social cost of cheating?

              g. In a repeated game what is the value of the reputation?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

a) The game is represented in the following table:

Share Fight
Share 15,15 5,18
Fight 18,5 7,7

Player 1's dominant strategy is to Fight as his payoffs from fighting are strictly greater than his payoffs from Sharing. Similarly, for player 2, his dominant strategy is also to Fight because of the strictly greater payoffs.

b) From the table above, it can be observed that the Nash Equilibrium of this game is when both players choose to fight and earn a payoff of 7 each.

c) Yes, this game has a dominant strategy equilibrium, which is the game's Nash Equilibrium as both players play their dominant strategy.

d) This is a Prisoner's Dilemma because if both players could collude, they would choose to Share and earn a strictly higher payoff of 15 each. Since they cannot collude, they end up with a Nash Equilibrium which offers them a lower payoff of 7 each.



Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Consider the following prisoner’s dilemma          ...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • a) Explain what is meant by the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” game. Do players have a dominant strategy...

    a) Explain what is meant by the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” game. Do players have a dominant strategy in this game? b) Create an example of a pay-off matrix for such a game c) Will the Nash equilibrium of this game result in the socially optimal outcome? *Explain why/why not* Your answer will be marked according to the following categories. PART A PART B PART C General Clarity of Explanations

  • n an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma (such as a repeated price war): Group of answer choices...

    n an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma (such as a repeated price war): Group of answer choices repeated defection is the only equilibrium. there are two different equilibria: repeated defection and repeated cooperation. repeated cooperation is the only equilibrium. each player cooperates in the early stages, but defects near the end of the game. there is no stable equilibrium strategy for either player.

  • A game involving two players with two possible strategies is a prisoner's dilemma if each player...

    A game involving two players with two possible strategies is a prisoner's dilemma if each player has a dominant strategy and: Select one: a. neither player plays their dominant strategy. b. each player's payoff is higher when both play their dominated strategy than when both play their dominant strategy. c. each player's payoff is lower when both play their dominant strategy than when both play their dominated strategy. d. there is a Nash equilibrium that yields the highest payoff for...

  • Consider the following normal form game: U D LR 7,7 4,8 8,4 5,5 a. Are there...

    Consider the following normal form game: U D LR 7,7 4,8 8,4 5,5 a. Are there dominant actions for any of the players? b. Find all Nash equilibria of this game. c. Suppose we repeat this game 10 times, specify a subgame perfect equi- librium of this finitely repeated game. d. Suppose this game is repeated infinitely: Identify a subgame perfect equilibrium of this game which gives an average (normalized) dis- counted payoff of 7 to both players. Clearly identify...

  • Exercise 6 (Difficult),. Consider the following modification of the prisoner's dilemma game. A-1,...

    Exercise 6 (Difficult),. Consider the following modification of the prisoner's dilemma game. A-1,-1-9,0-6,-2 B | 0,-9 |-6-61-5-10 C1-2,-6 |-10,-51-4,-4 You should recognise the payoff's from (A, L), (A, R). (B, L). (B, R) as those in the prisoner's dilemma game studied in class. We added two strategies, one for each player. Also note that strategies A and L are still (when compared to the original prisoner's dilemma game) strictly dominated . What is the set of Nash equilibria of this...

  • Mexico and the members of OPEC produce crude oil. Realizing that it would be in their...

    Mexico and the members of OPEC produce crude oil. Realizing that it would be in their best interests to form an agreement on production goals, a meeting is arranged and an informal, verbal agreement is reached. If both Mexico and OPEC stick to the agreement OPEC will earn profits of $200 million and Mexico will earn profits of $100 million. If both Mexico and OPEC cheat then OPEC will earn $175 million and Mexico will earn $80 million. If only...

  • The following matrix gives the payoff for Player 1 and Player 2 with R and L...

    The following matrix gives the payoff for Player 1 and Player 2 with R and L strategies. Assume that they determine their strategies simultaneously and independently. Player 2 R L R (5, 4) (-1, -1) Player 1 L (-1, -1) (2, 2) (a) Does Player 1 have a dominant strategy? Why or why not? What is its dominant strategy, if existing? (b) Does Player 2 have a dominant strategy? Why or why not? What is its dominant strategy, if existing?...

  • Question 54 1 pts Which of the following statements is true? o If a strategy is...

    Question 54 1 pts Which of the following statements is true? o If a strategy is weakly dominant, then it is also strictly dominant. None of the other answers is correct. Games with strictly dominant strategies guarantee that players achieve the highest available payoffs in Nash Equilibrium. If a two-player game has a strictly dominant strategy for one player, then it does not necessarily have a strictly dominant strategy for the other player. The prisoners' dilemma game has no strictly...

  • Consider the following game: Player2 U Player 1 M 100.99 0.0 99 100 0.0 1.1 0.0...

    Consider the following game: Player2 U Player 1 M 100.99 0.0 99 100 0.0 1.1 0.0 99. 10000 100.99 a. Does player 1 have a strictly dominant strategy? If the answer is yes, write the dominant strategy in the specified area and if the answer is no just write no b. Does player 2 have a strictly dominant strategyIf the answer is yes, write the dominant strategy in the specified area and if the answer is no just write no...

  • The dilemma in a prisoner's dilemma is that: Multiple Choice only one player has a dominant...

    The dilemma in a prisoner's dilemma is that: Multiple Choice only one player has a dominant strategy, but the other player is uncertain about what to do. the players would be better off if they both played a dominated strategy. the players may be trapped in a game they don’t know how to play. the outcome is random, so players are uncertain about which strategy to play.

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT