We have the following information
Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) = 0.6
Increase in government spending: ΔG = 5
Spending Multiplier = 1/(1 – MPC) = 1/(1 – 0.6) = 1/0.4 = 2.5
Change in the output: ΔY = ΔG × Spending Multiplier
ΔY = 5 × 2.5
ΔY = 12.5
So, the output will increase by 12.5
This is reflected in the following diagram by the upward shift of the aggregate expenditure curve from AE1 to AE2.
One can see that the change in the output is different from the change in the income. In fact, increase in output is higher than the increase in the government spending. This happens due to the presence of spending multiplier. When government spending increased initially it increased the aggregate demand and output in the economy directly by the amount of G increase, and thereafter through the multiplier effect as consumption and income levels rise. The increase in income due to increase in government spending stimulates consumption which cause further increase in demand and income, which again causes the consumption to increase and so forth. This process continues with each consecutive increase in consumption being less than the previous one as MPC is less than one.
It is because of this that the change in output is different from change in G.
Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume if.6 and that there is an increase in government...
Suppose the marginal propensity to consume is 0.7 and the government votes to increase taxes by $1.5 billion. Round to the nearest tenth if necessary. Assume the tax rate and the marginal propensity to import are 0. Calculate the tax multiplier tax multiplier:-2.3 Calculate the resulting change in the equilibrium quantity of real GDP demanded -3.5 billion
20. According to the Keynesian-cross analysis, if the marginal propensity to consume is 0.6, and government expenditures and lump-sum taxes are both increased by 100, equilibrium income will rise by A) 0 100 150 200 BOB
Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume in a country is 0.8, and the real potential output and current real GDP are respectively $800 billion and $700. To bring the economy to potential output, the government should increase its expenditure by $100 billion. True False
Suppose the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. The government increases government spending and taxes by $10 billion. What happens to aggregate output demanded?
15. According to the Keynesian-cross analysis, if MPC stands for marginal propensity to consume, then a rise in taxes of ΔT will: A) decrease equilibrium income by ΔT. B) decrease equilibrium income by ΔT/(1 – MPC). C) decrease equilibrium income by (ΔT)(MPC)/(1 – MPC). D) not affect equilibrium income at all. 16. Assume that a country’s MPS is equal to 0.4 and government expenditure is lowered by $20 billion, what is the effect on the country’s Y? A) It will...
Currently, a government's budget is balanced. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.80. The government has determined that each additional $10 Billion in new government debt it issues to finance a budget deficit pushes up the market interest rate by 0.1 percentage point. It has also determined that every 0.1 percentage point change in the market interest rate generates a change in investment expenditures equal to $2 Billion. Finally, the government knows that to close a recessionary gap and take...
Suppose the decision by the government is to increase government purchases by 100$ million. The marginal propensity to consume in the economy is .75. How does this decision affect the 2 different lines of an IS-LM model? Add lines if needed? How far is the new land from the old line?
If marginal propensity to consume falls. How does this affect the Keynesian cross model? Then how does it affect the IS Curve?
Use the aggregate expenditures model and assume the marginal propensity to consume is 0.90. An increase in government spending of $1 billion would result in an increase in GDP of?
explain the economic ideas behind the parametric constraint or restriction on the marginal propensity to consume, in the Keynesian model.