Question

Discuss the notion of relevancy as applied to United States v. Johnson

Answer 1

1 count one alleged that Johnson "knowingly, wilfully and 1. Discuss the notion of relevancy as applied to united States v. Johnson ? An- underr Feres v. united states, 340 0.5.135, the govercoment has no federal Tort claims Act CFTCA) liability pure injuries to members of military service arising out of ore in the course of activity incident to serovice. Respondent's husband, a helicopter pilot for the COosé Guard, was killed when his helicopter crashed during a rescue mission and shortly before the crash, ajr treaffic controlleres from the Federal Aviation Administration, a civilian agency of the federal goverment has assumed positive radare control over the helicopter, and after receiving ve terzan's benefits fore here husband death respondent filed an FICA action seeking damages from the Government on the ground that the controlleres negligence had caused the carsh Johnson's firest mission was to obtain an asset woroth $8 million to substantie de intercnational's net worlth while it sought payment from eastman on the promissorey note . To this end, he frravelled to Dallas to meet with William Breinlee, an acquainf one who dabbled in investments. Brzindee supplied Johnson with a document titled "Gold certificate contract", and the Federal government the charged Johnson with two counts of frald, ) 1 with unlawful and Prayudulent in interstate commerces aralely made security, that is gold certificate contract, knowing such security to be falselymade.

submitted by the government on its motion to dismiss plaindeff and had assured the plaintiff that his presence it court durcing the trial of the cause would not be The government Rided a motion to reopen the case on the ground that it was collusive and did not involve a real case orc controversy, and the effidavit of the planingin, the suit as collusive , shows without contradiction that he borought the present proceeding in a fictitious name that admitted that appellee's attorceny had ondertaken to procure an attorney to represent the necessary, and it appears from the district courry's opinion that no brzier evas filed on the plaintiffs behelf in that court.