(a)
H0: Null Hypothesis: The proportion of rainy days is not different among these four cities
HA:Alternative Hypothesis: The proportion of rainy days is different among these four cities (Claim)
Obsrved Frequencies:
LA | SF | SD | SJ | Total | |
Rain | 4 | 6 | 22 | 3 | 35 |
No rain | 21 | 17 | 63 | 20 | 121 |
Total | 25 | 23 | 85 | 23 | 156 |
Expected Frequencies:
LA | SF | SD | SJ | Total | |
Rain | 25X35/156=5.609 | 23X35/156=5.16 | 85X35/156=19.071 | 23X35/156=5.16 | 35 |
No rain | 25X121/156=19.391 | 23X121/156=17.84 | 85X121/156=65.929 | 23X121/156=17.84 | 121 |
Total | 25 | 23 | 85 | 23 | 156 |
Test Statistic ()
is calculated as follows:
Observed (O) | Expected (E) | (O - E)2/E |
4 | 5.609 | 0.462 |
6 | 5.16 | 0.137 |
22 | 19.071 | 0.45 |
3 | 5.16 | 0.904 |
21 | 19.391 | 0.134 |
17 | 17.84 | 0.04 |
63 | 65.929 | 0.13 |
20 | 17.84 | 0.262 |
Total = ![]() |
2.517 |
df = (2 - 1)X (4 - 1) = 3
From Table, critical value of
= 7.815
Since calculated value of
= 2.517 is less than critical value of
= 7.815, the difference is not significant. Fail to reject null
hypothesis.
Conclusion:
The data do not support the claim that the proportion of
rainy days is different among these four cities.
+36-3310 Detailed Sample Table Total Rain 35 LA SF SD SJ 4 6 22 3 5.2...