a) Answer: Figure 3
Figure 1 is incorrect, as the profits shown for the resort are not mentioned correctly. the profit in case of fair weather is shown as 20, which should actually be 160.
Figure 2 is incorrect, as EMVs for resort and home are not mentioned correctly.
EMV for resort = ( 0.7 x 160) + ( 0.3 x 20) = 112 + 6 = 118
EMV for home = (0.7 x 80) + (0.3 x 55) = 56 + 16.5 = 72.5
In Figure 2, EMV for the resort is mentioned as 72.5, and EMV for home is mentioned as 118. So, Figure 2 is incorrect.
Figure 3 is the correct answer. It shows all profits, profits, and EMVs correctly.
b)
EMV for resort = ( 0.7 x 160) + ( 0.3 x 20) = 112 + 6 = 118
EMV for home = (0.7 x 80) + (0.3 x 55) = 56 + 16.5 = 72.5
EMV for the resort is higher. Therefore, to maximize the return, for lunch sales, Sally's decision should be to use the resort.
Expected Monetary value for Sally = EMV for resort = $ 118
Sally owns a food truck and sells lunch either in her home town or at a...
A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...