Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL...

Question

Question

Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL )

L = {0n 1 0n | n >= 1}

Answer 1

Answer #1

L-{on, on Inst} The Language given is context free. can write the CFG for this Language, which is content free. CFG: since, w

CFG as 4-tople representation (N,TIPIS) N set of non-terminals {s, A} Ta set of terminals 0,1 Pe production rules soola A sol

please upvote and comment for doubts

Answer 2

Similar Homework Help Questions

5.) Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for...

5.) Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n | n >= 1}
6.) Is the languages Context Free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL...

6.) Is the languages Context Free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n 10n | n >= 1}
Use the CFL (Context Free Language) Pumping Lemma to show each of the following language not...

Use the CFL (Context Free Language) Pumping Lemma to show each of the following language not to be context-free: a) {a^n b^n c^i | i < n} b) {www | w is a binary string over {0,1}} SHOW ALL WORK AND LEAVE NO STEPS OUT!! NEED THIS ASAP! THANKS!!

use the pumping lemma for context free languages to prove the language is not context free....

use the pumping lemma for context free languages to prove the language is not context free. B = {w#t | w is a substring of t, where wit e {a,b}*}. Hint: consider s = apbº#apba.
Does a non-context-free language exist that doesn't break any of the rules of the pumping lemma...

Does a non-context-free language exist that doesn't break any of the rules of the pumping lemma for context-free languages? Yes. If a language is finite, it will pass the pumping lemma. No. Since the pumping lemma is used to prove a language is not context-free, a non-context-free language has to break the rules of the pumping lemma. No. If the results of a pumping lemma proof are inconclusive, a bad string was chosen. Yes. Otherwise, we could use the pumping...
(Automata): prove using the pumping lemma that the following language is not context-free: where: ; b)using...

(Automata): prove using the pumping lemma that the following language is not context-free: where: ; b)using closure properties and the previous proof, show that the following language is not context free language: Really need your help with this, it is important for the test. please explain what you to do so i can study it throughly. thank you very much! Labc be...bc2m de fefefnghqhq.h 1, т > п> о >0; > т,п, о 0; /12, ...j2n0; k1, k2,.. k, >...

Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that L3 is not a CFL. L3...

Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that L3 is not a CFL. L3 = { w: w e{a,b,c}* and na(w) < nh(w) < nc(w) }.
Theory of Computation - Non Context Free Languages Use the Context-Free Pumping Lemma to prove that...

Theory of Computation - Non Context Free Languages Use the Context-Free Pumping Lemma to prove that the following language is NOT context-free:
Prove that the language L = {a^pb^qc^r|p,q,r >=1 and pq = r} is not context free using pumping lemma. I honestly just...

Prove that the language L = {a^pb^qc^r|p,q,r >=1 and pq = r} is not context free using pumping lemma. I honestly just need help coming up with a string that works, thanks.

show that the language is context-free, or use the pumping lemma to show that the language...

show that the language is context-free, or use the pumping lemma to show that the language is non-context-free . waxl w.x e fo.1 and w contains the substring