Theory of Computation - Non Context Free Languages Use the Context-Free Pumping Lemma to prove that...

Question

Question

Theory of Computation - Non Context Free Languages

Use the Context-Free Pumping Lemma to prove that the following language is NOT context-free:

Answer 1

Answer #1

For proving The Language as not context free we need to make the assumption that

the language given is context free

And we should prove that assumption made by us is wrong.

Given Nono se need to use Gonext e pumping Lemma to solve the fellouing Longuoge L mut be hving pumping length Gsay ) has a p

Frrzt we need we need lo prt the sting s Ruch that 2cond, hong Shand satiy let us assume p Lemma Then the sting ket s divide

na the aumpbon e made is not rue Lo, the I 队mot contut fee it us check Condithorm casè 2 Cak o an d 乙- ffou The Conthonjvy

hence the grammer given is not context free grammer

Answer 2

Similar Homework Help Questions

use the pumping lemma for context free languages to prove the language is not context free....

use the pumping lemma for context free languages to prove the language is not context free. B = {w#t | w is a substring of t, where wit e {a,b}*}. Hint: consider s = apbº#apba.
Does a non-context-free language exist that doesn't break any of the rules of the pumping lemma...

Does a non-context-free language exist that doesn't break any of the rules of the pumping lemma for context-free languages? Yes. If a language is finite, it will pass the pumping lemma. No. Since the pumping lemma is used to prove a language is not context-free, a non-context-free language has to break the rules of the pumping lemma. No. If the results of a pumping lemma proof are inconclusive, a bad string was chosen. Yes. Otherwise, we could use the pumping...
6.) Is the languages Context Free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL...

6.) Is the languages Context Free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n 10n | n >= 1}

Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that L3 is not a CFL. L3...

Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that L3 is not a CFL. L3 = { w: w e{a,b,c}* and na(w) < nh(w) < nc(w) }.
Prove {0^i #0^j #0^(ij) | i, j ≥ 0} is not context free using the pumping lemma for context free languages.

Prove {0^i #0^j #0^(ij) | i, j ≥ 0} is not context free using the pumping lemma for context free languages.
2. (10 points) Use the pumping lemma for context free grammars to show the following languages...

2. (10 points) Use the pumping lemma for context free grammars to show the following languages are not context-free. (a) (5 points) . (b) (5 points) L = {w ◦ Reverse(w) ◦ w | w ∈ {0,1}∗}. I free grammar for this language L. lemma for context free grammars to show t 1. {OʻPOT<)} L = {w • Reverse(w) w we {0,1}*). DA+hattha follaurino lano

show that the language is context-free, or use the pumping lemma to show that the language...

show that the language is context-free, or use the pumping lemma to show that the language is non-context-free . waxl w.x e fo.1 and w contains the substring
Can someone use pumping Lemma to show if these are regular languages or not c) Is...

Can someone use pumping Lemma to show if these are regular languages or not c) Is L regular? give a finite automaton or prove using pumping lemma. (d) Is L context-free? give a context-free grammar or pushdown automaton, otherwise pr using pumping lemma. (16 pts)Given the set PRIMES (aP | p is prime (a) Prove that PRIMES is not regular. (b) Prove that PRIMES is not context-free. (c) Show if complement of PRIMES (PRIMES ) is regular or not. d)...
Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL...

Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n | n >= 1}

5.) Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for...

5.) Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n | n >= 1}