Prove {0^i #0^j #0^(ij) | i, j ≥ 0} is not context free using the pumping lemma for context free languages.

Question

Question

Answer 1

Answer #1

3 o6 1O 2 00# ooooo #000000 270 tue 3 513 True Bree uJuYz dou net belong to ㄴ our

Answer 2

Similar Homework Help Questions

6.) Is the languages Context Free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL...

6.) Is the languages Context Free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n 10n | n >= 1}
Theory of Computation - Non Context Free Languages Use the Context-Free Pumping Lemma to prove that...

Theory of Computation - Non Context Free Languages Use the Context-Free Pumping Lemma to prove that the following language is NOT context-free:
use the pumping lemma for context free languages to prove the language is not context free....

use the pumping lemma for context free languages to prove the language is not context free. B = {w#t | w is a substring of t, where wit e {a,b}*}. Hint: consider s = apbº#apba.

Let A = {aibjck | i > j > k}. Use the pumping lemma for context-free...

Let A = {aibjck | i > j > k}. Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to show that A is not context-free.
Use the pumping lemma to show that the following languages are not context free: a)0^n0^2n0^3n;n>=0 b)...

Use the pumping lemma to show that the following languages are not context free: a)0^n0^2n0^3n;n>=0 b) {w#x \ where w.x e {a,b) * and w is a substring of x} c) (a^ib^ja^ib^j|i,j>0) answer should be very clear .otherwise I will down vote .
Does a non-context-free language exist that doesn't break any of the rules of the pumping lemma...

Does a non-context-free language exist that doesn't break any of the rules of the pumping lemma for context-free languages? Yes. If a language is finite, it will pass the pumping lemma. No. Since the pumping lemma is used to prove a language is not context-free, a non-context-free language has to break the rules of the pumping lemma. No. If the results of a pumping lemma proof are inconclusive, a bad string was chosen. Yes. Otherwise, we could use the pumping...

Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that L3 is not a CFL. L3...

Use the pumping lemma for context-free languages to prove that L3 is not a CFL. L3 = { w: w e{a,b,c}* and na(w) < nh(w) < nc(w) }.
Can someone use pumping Lemma to show if these are regular languages or not c) Is...

Can someone use pumping Lemma to show if these are regular languages or not c) Is L regular? give a finite automaton or prove using pumping lemma. (d) Is L context-free? give a context-free grammar or pushdown automaton, otherwise pr using pumping lemma. (16 pts)Given the set PRIMES (aP | p is prime (a) Prove that PRIMES is not regular. (b) Prove that PRIMES is not context-free. (c) Show if complement of PRIMES (PRIMES ) is regular or not. d)...
Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL...

Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n | n >= 1}

5.) Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for...

5.) Is the following language context free or not? (prove / disprove using pumping lemma for CFL ) L = {0n 1 0n | n >= 1}