Question

6. What is "discovery" in the litigation context? 7. What are the the primary types of...

6. What is "discovery" in the litigation context?

7. What are the the primary types of discovery?

8. What is meant by a burden of proof in the context of a civil trial (i.e. a trial involving a civil law matter)?

9. Which party carries the burden of proof in a civil trial? What is that burden of proof?

10. Describe the two methods a party can use to prevent a person from serving as a juror in that party's trial.

11. What is hearsay evidence?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Ans.6

In the context of litigation, discovery is the legal process of producing a list of all documents which are related to the proceedings currently or formerly in the party’s possession. It is a key part of the litigation process, as it is often required to obtain the documents and information needed for evidence. Discovered documents can only be used for the purposes of the proceedings.

Ans 7

Primary types of discovery are:

1. Depositions: These are the sworn statements, when a person will answer questions from an attorney, and a court reporter will make a transcript of all that is said. It can be oral or written.

2. Interrogatories: Interrogatories are written questions that must be answered in writing, under oath.

3. Requests for production or permit inspection: A litigant is generally entitled to the production and inspection of relevant documents in the possession or inspection of any property.

4. Physical or mental examinations: Examinations of persons by a qualified expert when the condition of the party is in controversy. It is authorized by a court in the exercise of its discretion.

5. Admissions: A party may ask an adversary to admit any material fact or the authenticity of a document that is to be presented as evidence during the trial. Admissions are generally Known as written requests for admission of truth of matters, or genuineness of the facts.

Ans 8

The burden of proof is the obligation to present evidence on the subject of the lawsuit i.e. to prove or disprove a disputed fact. In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence i.e When an individual files a civil lawsuit against someone else, the burden of proof rests on his or her shoulders.

Ans 9

In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proof, which means the plaintiff must convince the judge that the facts are as presented and that there is grounds for the case.

Plaintiff has to prove or convince the jury that the facts and allegations are more likely to be true than false.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
6. What is "discovery" in the litigation context? 7. What are the the primary types of...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • 10. Describe the two methods a party can use to prevent a person from serving as...

    10. Describe the two methods a party can use to prevent a person from serving as a juror in that party's trial. 11. What is hearsay evidence?

  • Write a summary of this paragraph, in your own words. Jury Selection Before a jury trial...

    Write a summary of this paragraph, in your own words. Jury Selection Before a jury trial commences, a panel of jurors must be selected. Although some types of trials require twelve-person juries, most civil matters can be heard by six-person juries. The jury selection process is known as voir dire.Footnote In most jurisdictions, attorneys for the plaintiff and the defendant ask prospective jurors oral questions to determine whether they are biased or have any connection with a party to the...

  • BUSINESS LAW 44 A key to successful negotiation is to focus and concentrate on areas where...

    BUSINESS LAW 44 A key to successful negotiation is to focus and concentrate on areas where the parties agree. Answers: True False 45 Federal courts are generally courts of limited jurisdictiion and occasionally exclusive jurisdictiion. Answers: True False 46 The dispute in a federal question case must involve an amount in dispute of at least $75,000. Answers: True False 47 Based on the evidence presented by both sides, the jury decides the facts of what happened. Answers: True False 48...

  • affidavit A voluntary written statement sworn to before an authorized official arraignment An appearance in court...

    affidavit A voluntary written statement sworn to before an authorized official arraignment An appearance in court prior to a criminal trial. Often the identity of the defendant is established, the defendant is informed of the charges and of his or her rights, and the defendant is required to enter a plea defendant A person accused of a crime against whom legal action is brought deposition A statement made under oath outside of court that is intended to be used as...

  • TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page...

    TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • Here we set those articles into broad context. The literature generally supported taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SS...

    Here we set those articles into broad context. The literature generally supported taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): SSB taxes reduced purchase and consumption of those items across socioeconomic strata. In addition, some researchers suggest that SSB taxes as part of a more comprehensive approach may amplify the positive effects on obesity reduction and other health-related morbidities (Cobiac, Tam, Veerman, and Blakely, 2017). For example, an SSB tax combined with sugar, salt, alcohol, and tobacco taxes combined with subsidies for purchasing...

  • 1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in...

    1. Which of the following is true about a promissory estoppel? A) It is invoked in cases having incompetent parties. B) It permits a court to order enforcement of a contract that lacks consideration. C) It allows for a party to claim goods that were never paid for. D) It is invoked in cases that involve a promissory note. 2. Which of the following is true for a minor under the infancy doctrine? A) A minor is bound to the...

  • you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d...

    you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d 609 (1974) John SALSBURY, Appellee, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 55960. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1974. Laird, Burington, Bovard & Heiny, Mason City, and William F. McFarlin, Des Moines, for appellant. Boyd G. Hayes, Charles City, and William Pappas, Mason City, for appellee. Considered en banc. HARRIS, Justice. This is the third appeal in which we have considered a claim...

  • Is anyone help me this question? CASE 2-5 Coping with Corruption in Trading with Vietnam Corruption...

    Is anyone help me this question? CASE 2-5 Coping with Corruption in Trading with Vietnam Corruption is a fact of lifie in China. In fact Transparency Interna-fo travel to cash or gifts. (This was especially true when few tional, a German organization that applies its Corruption PerceptionPRC officials had been abroad.) As a result, traders report that Index (CP) globally. rates China with a CPl of 3.6 and is number dangling foreign trips in fromt of their PRC clients has...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT