What are 5 similarities and differences in accounting for long-lived assets under GAAP and IFRS?
Let’s look at the 5 biggest differences between IFRS and GAAP accounting.
IFRS is used in more than 110 countries around the world, including the EU and many Asian and South American countries. GAAP, on the other hand, is only used in the United States. Companies that operate in the U.S. and overseas may have more complexities in their accounting.
GAAP tends to be more rules-based, while IFRS tends to be more principles-based. Under GAAP, companies may have industry-specific rules and guidelines to follow, while IFRS has principles that require judgment and interpretation to determine how they are to be applied in a given situation.
However, convergence projects between FASB and IASB have resulted in new GAAP and IFRS standards that share more similarities than differences. For example, the recent GAAP standard for revenue from contracts with customers, Auditing Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) and the corresponding IFRS standard, IFRS 15, share a common principles-based approach.
Both GAAP and IFRS allow First In, First Out (FIFO), weighted-average cost, and specific identification methods for valuing inventories. However, GAAP also allows the Last In, First Out (LIFO) method, which is not allowed under IFRS. Using the LIFO method may result in artificially low net income and may not reflect the actual flow of inventory items through a company.
Both methods allow inventories to be written down to market value. However, if the market value later increases, only IFRS allows the earlier write-down to be reversed. Under GAAP, reversal of earlier write-downs is prohibited. Inventory valuation may be more volatile under IFRS.
IFRS allows revaluation of the following assets to fair value if fair value can be measured reliably: inventories, property, plant & equipment, intangible assets, and investments in marketable securities. This revaluation may be either an increase or a decrease to the asset’s value. Under GAAP, revaluation is prohibited except for marketable securities.
The similarities are --------
Generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, are the common set of accounting standards in the U.S. GAAP, issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), has been an ongoing development for the past 60 years; it includes the following items: Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Standards, Interpretations, and Staff Positions; Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinions; and AICPA Research Bulletins. Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees all U.S. accounting practices, making sure the accounting practices adhere to GAAP standards. GAAP establishes standards to make financial records relevant and reliable for all interested investors, stockholders, or other financial readers. So what about international companies? How do these companies develop financial information? International companies cannot just prepare their financial information under GAAP standards; they have to take the International Financial Standards rules into consideration as well.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in London developed the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS or iGAAP). Today, the European Union requires all companies in Europe to follow accounting practices under the IFRS method. Over 100 countries currently use IFRS. When the U.S. completely adopts IFRS, it will be easier to compare U.S. companies to foreign companies, and would therefore allow U.S. companies to raise capital in foreign markets.
GAAP and IFRS are alike in many ways, thus making the convergence a realizable task. The conceptual frameworks of both methods are very similar in structure, referring to their accounting objectives, elements, and qualitative characteristics. A major similarity between GAAP and IFRS is that both standards use an income statement, a balance sheet, and a statement of cash flows. When dealing with cash and cash equivalents, both methods are essentially the same. Another major similarity is that both GAAP and IFRS prepare financial statements on an accrued basis; meaning revenue is recognized when it is realized or realizable. There are many other similarities between GAAP and IFRS, and will therefore help in a complete convergence in the near future, but before there is one international financial accounting set of standards, the differences between GAAP and IFRS have to be taken into consideration.
One major difference between accounting practices in GAAP and IFRS is that GAAP is rule-based while IFRS is principle-based. Principle-based accounting allows for different interpretation of the same transactions, where rule-based GAAP follows a set of rules in preparing financial statements – this means there is no room for error. In other words, GAAP standards are extremely strict in accounting practices and disclosure requirements, whereas IFRS practices are less restrictive; for example, the GAAP method is stricter when preparing income statements, where it requires use of a single-step or multiple step approach – IFRS does not mention either approach. In addition to the multiple-step income statement in GAAP, unusual and infrequent items must be included as extraordinary items – extraordinary items are prohibited in IFRS. There is also a major difference between the two methods in relation to the LIFO (last in first out) cost flow assumption. Only GAAP accepts the LIFO method for inventory valuation, whereas IFRS can only use average cost and FIFO (first in first out) for inventory valuation. The differences between the two methods need to be resolved to benefit economic globalization.
The different methods can be problematic to potential investors in international markets, because it will be difficult to interpret and understand financial information. It will be financially beneficial for the global economy when the accounting standards are merged into one set of rules. The FASB and IASB have issued a memorandum of understanding where they are to make the existing financial standards compatible, and once ensured, they intend on keeping compatibility. In efforts to converge, FASB has issued a rule that permits a fair value option for financial instruments. In 2009 the SEC allowed some U.S. companies to use IFRS, with plans on a full convergence by 2016.
In conclusion, it is important for economic globalization that GAAP converges with IFRS into one set of high-quality international standards. A unified set of accounting standards will provide companies, investors, creditors, financial users, etc. with helpful information that is relevant and reliable for making financial decisions. The similarities with GAAP and IFRS already provide some ease with the merge. And though there are still many differences, short-term and long-term efforts are in practice with hopes to merge GAAP and IFRS in the near future.
What are 5 similarities and differences in accounting for long-lived assets under GAAP and IFRS?
Discuss the major similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Which of the differences do you find most interesting?If there is a convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, would you choose the U.S. GAAP or IFRS method? Why?
Compare the accounting for intangible assets under GAAP and IFRS. Identify at least one difference in GAAP and IFRS reporting that should be adopted under GAAP in your opinion and explain why.
Asymmetric U.S. GAAP: Under U.S. GAAP, long-lived assets, such as real estate are reported on the balance sheet at the original purchase price of the asset. In the event that the value of a real estate becomes “impaired”—that is, the current market value of the real estate falls below its original purchase price and is unlikely to recover the lost value in the foreseeable future—the asset’s book value is written down to the lower current value and a loss is...
Write five differences between GAAP and IFRS in terms of ASSETS.
Which of the following is true with regard to pension accounting under GAAP and IFRS? Group of answer choices The accounting for defined-benefit pension plans is the same under GAAP and IFRS. Accounting for defined-benefit pensions is typically a less important issue in the U. S. than in other parts of the world. Prior service cost is recognized on the balance sheet under both GAAP and IFRS. Prior service cost is amortized into income over the expected service lives of...
Which of the following is true with regard to pension accounting under U.S. GAAP and IFRS? Prior service cost is recognized on the balance sheet under both U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Accounting for defined-benefit pensions is typically a less important issue in the U. S. than in other parts of the world. The accounting for defined-benefit pension plans is the same under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The accounting for defined contribution p
Current Attempt in Progress IFRS and GAAP are similar in the accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal. are diametrically opposed in their accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal. are moving toward common ground in their accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal. are moving further apart in their accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal.
IFRS and GAAP a. are moving further apart in their accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal. b. are diametrically opposed in their accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal. c. are similar in the accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal. d. are moving toward common ground in their accounting for impairments of assets held for disposal.
for the Apple Inc. company what is the differences for GAAP and IFRS?
16- US GAAP and the IFRS differ on their definition of financial assets in that only the IFRS defines it as: a) An equity instrument (of anther entity) b) A contractual right to receive cash c)There is no difference in the definition between US GAAP and the IFRS 17- Under IFRS, a lease is not an operating lease and is classified as capital lease when: a) 50% or more of its economic life transfers to the lessee b) Risks and...