Question

. Scenario #1: Tarbox Toyota and the Historic Cost of Inventory On December 6, 2019, Tarbox Toyota placed an order to buy twe
Assume that Tarbox Toyota did not sell any of the cars received on December 30th until January 2020 AMOUNT In its GAAP balanc
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1
1 Total Historic cost value of cars as inventory as on Dec 30, 2019, Tar box Toyota would record to compaly with GAAP
No of units Cost per Unit TOTAL COST
IN $ IN $
Cost as per order 25 17560 439000
Less: Special discount allowed by TOYOTA 25 560 14000
( $ 439000 - $ 425000)
Net Cost 25 17000 425000
Delivory charges 8450
TOTAL LANDED COST 25 17338 433450
Suggested Retail Price per vehicle 19600
Total Sales value (given as per the question) 462500
Total Historic cost value of cars as inventory as on Dec 30, 2019, Tar box Toyota would record to compaly with GAAP $ 433450
AVERAGE HISTORIC COST PER CAR RECORDED BY TAR BOX TOYOTA IN ITS INVENTORY AS ON DECEMBER 30, 2019 $ 17338
NOTES
1) As per GAAP, Inventory cost includes all sums of applicable charges and expenditure directly or indirectly incurred in bringing the article to its existance condition and location. Hence the cost of delivery is to be added with the purchase cost for valuation.
2) As per GAAP, Inventory is to be recorded at the lessor of cost or Market value.   Hre market value is higher than cost hence cost value to be recorded
2 Assuming that Tarbox Toyota does not sells any cars received on December 30, 2019 until January 2020 . In the Balance Sheet of December 31,2010 the value of inventory Tarbox Toyota should be recorded is $ 433450
Note: Sale of car in the sebsequent period does not effect the method of valuation of inventory in the previous period.    The only exection is the Replacement cost consideration, which does not affect here in the cost of cars  
3 Assuming that Tarbox Toyota sold 2 Nos card in December 2019 the the value of inventory is
Nos Cost in $ Value in $
Total No of cars received 25 17338 433450
Less: cars sold 2 17338 34676
VALUE OF INVENTORY AS ON DEC 30, 2019 TARBOX TOYOTA TO BE RECORDED 23 17338 398774
Note: Sale value does not effect the value of inventory since market value is higher than cost
4 COST OF GOODS SOLD EXPENSES VALUE AS ON DECEMBER 31, 2019 TARBOX TOYOTA SHOULD REPORTED IN ITS INCOME STATEMENT $ 34676
Note: Cost of goods sold = Materil cost + any other direct expens atributable for making the goods ready for sale
In the present senario there is no addition cost incurred, hence the landing cost to be recorded as COGS
Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
. Scenario #1: Tarbox Toyota and the Historic Cost of Inventory On December 6, 2019, Tarbox...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Please show work as i am trying to learn online classes are extremely difficult for me...

    Please show work as i am trying to learn online classes are extremely difficult for me Required: Analyze the situations described in the scenarios and apply the historic cost principle to correctly answer the questions presented in the tables at the end of the scenarios. Write your answers to the questions in the spaces provided. Scenario #1: Tarbox Toyota and the Historic Cost of Inventory (12 points) • On December 6, 2019, Tarbox Toyota placed an order to buy twenty-five...

  • Page 4 of 13 Scenario #2: Hayashi Enterprises (8 points) Hayashi Enterprises wanted to purchase a...

    Page 4 of 13 Scenario #2: Hayashi Enterprises (8 points) Hayashi Enterprises wanted to purchase a used machine from Rodopoulos Manufacturing to use in its factory operations. Rodopoulos Manufacturing listed the used machine on an e-commerce trading site at a price of $650,000. Hayashi Enterprises inspected the machine and was convinced that it was worth $635,000, a price that was supported by an independent appraiser. The companies eventually agreed to a price of $638,000. Hayashi Enterprises closed the deal on...

  • The Mateo Corporation's inventory at December 31, 2019, was $325,000 based on a physical count priced...

    The Mateo Corporation's inventory at December 31, 2019, was $325,000 based on a physical count priced at cost, and before any necessary adjustment for the following: Merchandise costing $30,000, shipped F.o.b. shipping point from a vendor on December 30, 2019, was received on January 5, 2020. Merchandise costing $22,000, shipped F.o.b. destination from a vendor on December 28, 2019, was received on January 3, 2020. Merchandise costing $38,000 was shipped to a customer F.o.b. destination on December 28, 2019, arrived...

  • E8.13 (L04) (luventoriable Costs --Error Adjustments) Werth Company asks you to review its December 31, 2019,...

    E8.13 (L04) (luventoriable Costs --Error Adjustments) Werth Company asks you to review its December 31, 2019, inventory values and prepare the necessary adjustments to the books. The following information is given to you. 1. Werth uses the periodic method of recording inventory. A physical count reveals $234,890 of inven- tory on hand at December 31, 2019. 2. Not included in the physical count of inventory is $10,420 of merchandise purchased on December 15 from Browser. This merchandise was shipped f.ob....

  • The Kwok Company’s inventory balance on December 31, 2018, was $255,000 (based on a 12/31/18 physical...

    The Kwok Company’s inventory balance on December 31, 2018, was $255,000 (based on a 12/31/18 physical count) before considering the following transactions: Goods shipped to Kwok f.o.b. destination on December 20, 2018, were received on January 4, 2019. The invoice cost was $48,000. Goods shipped to Kwok f.o.b. shipping point on December 28, 2018, were received on January 5, 2019. The invoice cost was $35,000. Goods shipped from Kwok to a customer f.o.b. destination on December 27, 2018, were received...

  • enario #4: Law Orrice of Casey Novak (6 points, April 15, 2018, the Law Office of...

    enario #4: Law Orrice of Casey Novak (6 points, April 15, 2018, the Law Office of Casey Novak signed a one-year lease with Cabot P office space from May 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019 at a cost of $7,200 per month. During 2018 the Law Office of Casey Novak used the office space from May 1 through December 31 as provided by the lease. puring 2018 the Law Office of Casey Novak paid $86,400 cash to Cabot Properties as...

  • Sanderson Company’s inventory of $1.1 million at December 31, 2017, was based on a physical count...

    Sanderson Company’s inventory of $1.1 million at December 31, 2017, was based on a physical count of goods priced at cost and before any year-end adjustments relating to the following items. (a) Goods shipped f.o.b. shipping point on December 24, 2017, from a vendor at an invoice cost of $80,000 to Sanderson Company, received on January 4, 2018. (b) Goods worth $39,000 and included in the physical count, billed to Makee Corp., f.o.b. shipping point, on December 31, 2017. The...

  • 1. Included in the physical count were tools billed to a customer fo.b.shipping point on December...

    1. Included in the physical count were tools billed to a customer fo.b.shipping point on December 31, 2020. These tools had a cost of $32,200 and were billed at $41,200. The shipment was on Blossom's loading dock waiting to be picked up by the common carrier. 2. Goods were in transit from a vendor to Blossom on December 31, 2020. The invoice cost was $77,200, and the goods were shipped f.o.b. shipping point on December 29, 2020. 3. Work in...

  • 5. On December 31, 2019, Woods Co. sold goods to a customer and agreed to accept...

    5. On December 31, 2019, Woods Co. sold goods to a customer and agreed to accept a 3- year, $59,000 noninterest-bearing promissory note in return. The note requires the customer to make a single $59,000 payment on December 31, 2022 to settle its obligation. The relevant market rate of interest on the sale date is 6 %. How much sales revenue must Woods recognize from the December 31, 2019 transaction? $9,462 $59,000. $49,538. C. D. A. $0. В. On December...

  • Blossom Company asks you to review its December 31, 2017, inventory values and prepare the necessary...

    Blossom Company asks you to review its December 31, 2017, inventory values and prepare the necessary adjustments to the books. The following information is given to you. 1. Blossom uses the periodic method of recording inventory. A physical count reveals $446,291 of inventory on hand at December 31, 2017. 2. Not included in the physical count of inventory is $25,498 of merchandise purchased on December 15 from Browser. This merchandise was shipped f.o.b. shipping point on December 29 and arrived...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT