This paper is about the "Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticity" and the link for this study is given below:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314286/
can you please help me these questions because i'm having a hard time understanding the paper:
Answer the following questions:
4) Do you believe the author’s data presented in the paper (and any supplements) support their hypothesis. If not, why not?
5) Are there other experiments or experimental modification that should have been performed by the researchers?
6) Does the discussion carefully lay out an argument that supports the hypothesis? If not, what do you believe was missing?
7) Does the statistical analysis strengthen or weaken the conclusions of the paper.
8) What are the conclusions of the paper? Do you agree with the conclusions?
9) Does the author overstate their findings or perhaps not enough?
This paper is about the "Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticity" and the link...
1. According to the paper, what does lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) do and what does it allow to happen within the myofiber? (5 points) 2. According to the paper, what is the major disadvantage of relying on glycolysis during high-intensity exercise? (5 points) 3. Using Figure 1 in the paper, briefly describe the different sources of ATP production at 50% versus 90% AND explain whether you believe this depiction of ATP production applies to a Type IIX myofiber in a human....
Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer up un these questions guidelines 1) can empathy lead us astrary? how 2) our heart will always go out to the baby in the well, its a measure of our humanity. but empathy will have to yield to reason if humanity is to have a future can empathy yield to reason? how? thank you The Baby in the Well: The Case against Empathy* -Paul...