Question

Pragmatism and Feminist Epistemology both challenge the view of knowledge as a detached, intellectual activity. Do you think they are right? How do you think we should think about knowledge? Now that we have concluded the section on epistemology, write about what kind of thing you think knowledge is.

Answer 1

pragmatism and feminist epistemology would be challenging views of knowledge. This is a view that is agreeable, according to me. According to the pragmatists, knowledge would be coming to us only when someone would be involved in the content on their own.

For gaining real knowledge, a person requires to be manipulated and things require to be proven up with experiments. Things could only be learnt through experiments such that real results would be allowing a person to arrive at a conclusion.

This is a detached form of obtaining knowledge, which is much better and represents the modern form of experimentation.

Further, the feminist view invokes in thought processes. If the women did not put in efforts in striving for equality, they would have continued to be falling under the traps of men. The women require to organise and participate their thoughts and put them with vigour, which has allowed them to stand with firmness.