Question

1. If a published paper reports that their F-test results have an associated p value <0.01, you could conclude that the test result is: a) rare (strong), supporting the null hypothesis b) rare (strong), supporting the research (alternate) hypothesis c) common, supporting the null hypothesis d) common, supporting the research hypothesis e) none of the above 2. The more that the variability groups exceeds the variability groups, the more suspect the null hypothesis. a) between; within b) within; between c) rare; common d) none of the above 3.
Biostats. Please help! Thank you!!!

Answer 1

We are allowed to do only 1 question at a time. Post again for other answers.

1)

A option

In the majority of analyses, an alpha of 0.05 is used as the cutoff for significance. If the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis that there's no difference between the means and conclude that a significant difference does exist.