1. The numbers below represent heights (in feet) of 3-year old
elm trees. 5.1, 5.5, 5.8, 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 7.0,
7.2, 7.3, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.7, 7.9, 8.1, 8.1, 8.2,
8.3, 8.5, 8.6, 8.6, 8.7, 8.7, 8.9, 8.9, 9.0, 9.1,
9.3, 9.4, 9.6, 9.8, 10.0, 10.2, 10.2
Using the chi-square goodness-of-fit test, determine whether the heights of 3-year old elm trees are normally distributed, at the a = .05 significance level. Also, find the p- value.
The hypothesis being tested is:
H0: The heights of 3-year old elm trees are not normally distributed
Ha: The heights of 3-year old elm trees are normally distributed
The output is:
observed | expected | O - E | (O - E)² / E | % of chisq |
5.1 | 7.973 | -2.873 | 1.035 | 12.58 |
5.5 | 7.973 | -2.473 | 0.767 | 9.32 |
5.8 | 7.973 | -2.173 | 0.592 | 7.20 |
6.1 | 7.973 | -1.873 | 0.440 | 5.35 |
6.2 | 7.973 | -1.773 | 0.394 | 4.79 |
6.4 | 7.973 | -1.573 | 0.310 | 3.77 |
6.7 | 7.973 | -1.273 | 0.203 | 2.47 |
6.8 | 7.973 | -1.173 | 0.173 | 2.10 |
6.9 | 7.973 | -1.073 | 0.144 | 1.75 |
7 | 7.973 | -0.973 | 0.119 | 1.44 |
7.2 | 7.973 | -0.773 | 0.075 | 0.91 |
7.3 | 7.973 | -0.673 | 0.057 | 0.69 |
7.3 | 7.973 | -0.673 | 0.057 | 0.69 |
7.4 | 7.973 | -0.573 | 0.041 | 0.50 |
7.5 | 7.973 | -0.473 | 0.028 | 0.34 |
7.7 | 7.973 | -0.273 | 0.009 | 0.11 |
7.9 | 7.973 | -0.073 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
8.1 | 7.973 | 0.127 | 0.002 | 0.02 |
8.1 | 7.973 | 0.127 | 0.002 | 0.02 |
8.2 | 7.973 | 0.227 | 0.006 | 0.08 |
8.3 | 7.973 | 0.327 | 0.013 | 0.16 |
8.5 | 7.973 | 0.527 | 0.035 | 0.42 |
8.6 | 7.973 | 0.627 | 0.049 | 0.60 |
8.6 | 7.973 | 0.627 | 0.049 | 0.60 |
8.7 | 7.973 | 0.727 | 0.066 | 0.81 |
8.7 | 7.973 | 0.727 | 0.066 | 0.81 |
8.9 | 7.973 | 0.927 | 0.108 | 1.31 |
8.9 | 7.973 | 0.927 | 0.108 | 1.31 |
9 | 7.973 | 1.027 | 0.132 | 1.61 |
9.1 | 7.973 | 1.127 | 0.159 | 1.94 |
9.3 | 7.973 | 1.327 | 0.221 | 2.68 |
9.4 | 7.973 | 1.427 | 0.255 | 3.10 |
9.6 | 7.973 | 1.627 | 0.332 | 4.03 |
9.8 | 7.973 | 1.827 | 0.419 | 5.09 |
10 | 7.973 | 2.027 | 0.515 | 6.26 |
10.2 | 7.973 | 2.227 | 0.622 | 7.56 |
10.2 | 7.973 | 2.227 | 0.622 | 7.56 |
295 | 295.000 | 0.000 | 8.229 | 100.00 |
8.23 | chi-square | |||
36 | df | |||
1.0000 | p-value |
The p-value from the output is 1.0000.
Since the p-value (1.0000) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we can conclude that the heights of 3-year old elm trees are normally distributed.
Please give me a thumbs-up if this helps you out. Thank you!
1. The numbers below represent heights (in feet) of 3-year old elm trees. 5.1, 5.5, 5.8,...
The data on the below shows the number of hours a particular drug is in the system of 200 females. Develop a histogram of this data according to the following intervals: Follow the directions. Test the hypothesis that these data are distributed exponentially. Determine the test statistic. Round to two decimal places. (sort the data first) [0, 3) [3, 6) [6, 9) [9, 12) [12, 18) [18, 24) [24, infinity) 34.7 11.8 10 7.8 2.8 20 9.8 20.4 1.2 7.2...
The data table contains waiting times of customers at a bank, where customers enter a single waiting line that feeds three teller windows. Test the claim that the standard deviation of waiting times is less than 2.4 minutes, which is the standard deviation of waiting times at the same bank when separate waiting lines are used at each teller window. Use a significance level of 0.01. Complete parts (a) through (d) below. Customer Waiting Times (in minutes) 7.5 6.5 9.2...
Calculate the 99% confidence interval for the following sample. Sample: 7.9, 8.3, 8.4, 9.6, 7.7, 8.1, 6.8, 7.5, 8.6, 8, 7.8, 7.4, 8.4, 8.9, 8.5, 9.4, 6.9, 7.7. Assume normality of the data. Enter the left confidence interval border (round to 3 decimal places): Enter the right confidence interval border (round to 3 decimal places):
Movie Ratings8.78.97.67.27.28.18.86.88.79.08.57.98.79.19.07.28.47.57.79.09.38.76.99.28.49.29.09.18.98.29.48.38.17.99.18.78.67.88.47.8Movie runtimes201124136155131161110132116136911279612612913512411617012117511818911713610819589881221191161261151531431181291441321) Do you think there is a linear correlation between Movie Ratings and their Runtimes? Explain why or why not before doing any work!2) Is there a linear correlation between the data based on the correlation coefficient? Explain.3) Find the linear regression line and explain what it means in English.4) Perform a hypothesis test at the 5% level of significance to see if a correlation is significant.
Customer Waiting Times (in minutes) 7.4 6.9 6.9 6.8 7.4 6.6 7.7 6.5 7.2 7.9 8.7 7.2 7.4 7.9 6.9 6.7 8.9 7.1 7.6 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.3 5.9 7.3 6.8 6.7 6.9 7.8 7.4 6.8 6.9 6.1 6.4 5.3 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.5 6.3 7.6 7.1 6.9 8.7 7.4 6.4 6.8 7.2 8.6 6.1 7.1 6.7 7.5 7.6 7.1 8.1 7.3 7.5 7.8 6.3 The accompanying data table includes weights (in grams) of a simple random sample of 40...
#2
Consider the followi ng sample of 44 observations: 8.9: 12.4: 8.6: 11.3; 9.2; 8.8;8.8; 6.2; .07; 7.1; 8; 10.7; 7.6; 9.1; 9.2; 8.2; 9.0; 8.7; 9.1; 10.9;10.3; 9.6; 7.8; 11.5; 9.3; 7.9; 8.8; 12.7; 8.4; 7.8; 5.7; 10.5; 10.5; 9.6; 8.9;10.2; 10.3; 7.7; 10.6; 8.3; 8.8; 9.5; 8.8; 9.4. 1. Find the mean and the standard deviation for the data given. We were unable to transcribe this image
Compute the correlation coefficient, r, for all five variables (columns). Interpret your findings whether you have determined any relationship between variables. X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 The data (X1, X2, X3, X4, X5) are by city. 8 78 284 9.1 109 X1 = death rate per 1000 residents 9.3 68 433 8.7 144 X2 = doctor availability per 100,000 residents 7.5 70 739 7.2 113 X3 = hospital availability per 100,000 residents 8.9 96 1792 8.9 97 X4 = annual...
Parametirc test or not:Test statistic:p-value:decision:Is There A Difference Between the Means?6.7 6.2 3.1 310.3 10 5 5.56.9 5.5 3.3 3.110.5 6.3 4.3 5.44.5 4.6 1.8 25.6 5.6 2 2.65.9 6.1 2.1 2.58 11.7 4 4.68 7.4 3.3 3.15.8 5.2 3.1 2.96 7.3 3.0 3.28.7 5.3 2.7 36 5.5 2.1 2.27.2 6.3 3.5 3.25.9 4.6 2.9 3.46 7.4 3 3.37.2 7.8 3.7 3.48.6 9.4 5.1 5.77.2 8.1 2.8 3.15.8 5.4 2.2 1.83.3 4 1.7 1.86.8 5.1 2 1.83.7 3.5 2.2 2.112...
A comparison was made of the average length of stay (in days) for the years 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 between males and females (ages 45–64) for seven diagnoses. The data indicates: 2000 2005 2010 2015 Males: Malignant Neoplasm 9.2 9.4 8.2 7.0 Diabetes Mellitus 7.9 7.3 6.6 6.5 Diseases of the Heart 6.5 5.8 5.0 4.8 Cerebrovascular disease 10.2 10.0 6.2 6.8 Pneumonia 8.0 7.9 7.2 6.9 Injuries and poisoning 6.6 7.2 5.8 5.5 Fractures 7.5 7.2 6.7 6.3...
The data contained in the file named StateUnemp show the unemployment rate in March 2011 and the unemployment rate in March 2012 for every state.† State Unemploy- ment Rate March 2011 Unemploy- ment Rate March 2012 Alabama 9.3 7.3 Alaska 7.6 7.0 Arizona 9.6 8.6 Arkansas 8.0 7.4 California 11.9 11.0 Colorado 8.5 7.8 Connecticut 9.1 7.7 Delaware 7.3 6.9 Florida 10.7 ...