a) Total cropland = 11% of land surface
thus (11/100)*5*1014=5.5*1013m2=5.5*109 hectartoe
Now slow growing trees fix = ~1 metric of dry matter / hectare / year
and 50 % of it is carbon. Thus actual offset = ( 50/100) * 1= 0.5 metric ton of carbon / hectare / year.
Thus amount of offset if all croplands replaced with slow growing trees will be 5.5*109*0.5= ~2.75*109 metric ton of carbon/hectare/year
b) Simillarly b) can be solved. Answer is 2.75*1010 metric ton of carbon / hectare/ year
c) Simillarly c) will be ~ 1.125*1011 metric ton of carbon / hectare /year.
d) No, I dont think this is realistic. It is not practical to replace all croplands and arable land with fast growing trees. Even if we did replace them, its not going to have very profound impact because the amount of emission is still very very high compared to the offset that will be achieved.
e) If itthis were to be done, serious issues will have to be taken in consideration. for example
1. How to take care of food production for the huge population?
2. What will happen to the different existing plant and animals which together form the ecosystem?
3. How to take up such large scale plantation and replacement?
4. To convince the people about such a thing.
You will establish whether or not current global fossil fuel combustion CO_2 emissions can offset by...