Answer: - To Prove that there exist a Jordan measurable set contained in R is not a Borel set. Our goal here is to construct a measurable set which is not Borel set and such a set exists because L measure is completion of Borel measure. We can understand it by example, f: [0, 1] -> [0, 2], f(x) = c(x) + x. f is strictly increasing: f’ = 1 almost everywhere. f is continuous: both c and x are continuous. f-1 exists: by intermediate value theorem f(2) = 0, f(1) = 2. f-1 is continuous let’s go with claim
Problem 19. Prove that there exists a Jordan measurable set contained in IR which is not...
(4) Let (Q,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω-> R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: f is measurable . f-(I) E A for any open interval I CR .f-(A) E A for any open set ACR. . f-(A) E A for any Borel set ACR. (4) Let (Q,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω-> R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: f is measurable . f-(I) E A for any open...
(4) Let (Ω,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω → R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: ·f is measurable. ·f-1(1) E A for any open interval I c R. lei f (A) E A for any open set ACR ·f-1 (A) E A for any Borel set A c R. (4) Let (Ω,A) be a measurable space, and let f : Ω → R. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: ·f is measurable. ·f-1(1)...
give correct solution only be a Thm : cet & be measurable set in IR and fet fiE ROO measurable function of to a e in e then of lebesgue integrable on E and { fonde (converse does not hold)
this problem is related to meaure theory Problem 3. Let f be a nonnegative measurable function on R. Show that imd. 72 IR Problem 3. Let f be a nonnegative measurable function on R. Show that imd. 72 IR
het T:V W be an isomorphism. Prove That ir & w, wg... ... on} is Set in wel, then the premages of dwe, log... an} a linearly Independent set knearly Independent 19
Define Jordan Measure and prove If is a finite set consisting of precisely n elements, show that S has zero Jordan measure. Explain in Detail {urg} = S
3. Let E E Lm* (Lebesgue measurable set). Prove that there exist a set G (a countable intersection of open sets), and a set F (a countable union of closed sets) such that F CE C G and m* (F) the Lebesgue measure of a set Hint: The Lebesgue measure can be calculated in terms of open and closed sets m* (E) m* (G), where m* denotes 3. Let E E Lm* (Lebesgue measurable set). Prove that there exist a...
equivalent 4. Let E C R. Prove that the following statements are (a) E is Lebesgue measurable (b) Given e> 0, there exist m* denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set (c) Given e 0, there exist a closed set F such that F C E and m* (E- F) < E. (d) There exists a set G (a countable intersection of open sets) such that E C G and m* (G - E) 0 (e) There exists a set...
equivalent 4. Let E C R. Prove that the following statements are (a) E is Lebesgue measurable (b) Given e> 0, there exist m* denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set (c) Given e 0, there exist a closed set F such that F C E and m* (E- F) < E. (d) There exists a set G (a countable intersection of open sets) such that E C G and m* (G - E) 0 (e) There exists a set...
equivalent 4. Let E C R. Prove that the following statements are (a) E is Lebesgue measurable (b) Given e> 0, there exist m* denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set (c) Given e 0, there exist a closed set F such that F C E and m* (E- F) < E. (d) There exists a set G (a countable intersection of open sets) such that E C G and m* (G - E) 0 (e) There exists a set...