Procter & Gamble Five Forces Analysis (Porter’s) in Marketing Plan
Procter & Gamble (P&G) is a leading consumer goods company headquartered in Ohio, USA. It was founded in 1937 by James Gamble and William Procter. Its product range includes personal care, cleaning agents, and hygiene products. In 2014, the company decided to shrink its product portfolio by dropping or selling off around 100 brands so that it can focus more on the remaining 65 brands which earn 95% of its revenue. The company's products are sold all over the world. Over the many years, the company has redefined the ways of doing business in Consumer Goods. During its growth, P&G has acquired a many companies such as Pantene and Gillette in order to diversify its product portfolio and hence increase profits.
Below is a detailed Porter Five Forces Model Analysis of Procter & Gamble-
Competitive Rivalry
P&G operates in the consumer goods market. It is an industry with intense competition. There are a large number of players that are making similar products. All the products made by P&G are also being made by other companies such as Unilever. The switching cost of the customers is almost zero. One day they may be using P&G products such a Tide washing detergent and the next day they can shift to Ariel washing detergent of Unilever. Most companies in the industry tackle this issue by continuously offering promotions with their products such as extra percent of product, discounts, gifts etc in order retain their customer base and attract new customers. Customers thus have a lot of variety to select from. There is little brand loyalty amongst customers in this industry. Hence, the competitive rivalry is high for P&G.
Threat of New Entrants-
In the consumer goods industry, there are a few entry barriers. A large capital is needed to be invested at the beginning, development of economies of scale takes time and strong channels of distribution are not easy to get access to. The existing players in the market have grown to become corporate giants now and can easily acquire any new entrant that poses a significant threat to them. These brands have also developed considerable reputations in the market. However, in many countries, smaller firms have entered in this market and are serving the local industry and have captured sizeable market shares away from P&G and others. They started off on a small scale and gradually increased their distributions. This makes the threat of new entrants a moderate threat for P&G.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers-
The supplies of P&G mainly include raw materials, technology products and packaging material for the products. There are a large number of suppliers in the market for all of these. Hence, the supplier switching cost is low for P&G. Also, the company purchases in very large quantities making it ideal for any supplier. Therefore, the suppliers are in no position to bargain with or attempt to influence the prices of P&G products. Hence, this threat is low for P&G.
Bargaining Power of Buyers -
There is very little product differentiation for the many products made by different companies in the consumer goods industry. Thus, the customers have a lot of variety to select from. The switching cost is also low for the customers. However, there is a considerable level of brand loyalty for some of the products made by P&G, especially in the personal hygiene and cosmetics segment, amongst the customers. They will continue to purchase these products as they find them suitable to their requirements. They are less price sensitive for these products. Hence, the bargaining power of the buyers in against P&G is of a moderate level.
Threat of Substitutes -
There are no suitable substitutes in the market for most of the products of P&G. E.g. there are no suitable substitutes for the soaps and shampoos that the company makes. Especially, in the personal hygiene category, customers are very reluctant to try other substitutes due to health risks. They will continue to use products of P&G or of some other brand but will not go for any lesser known substitute. Hence, there is a very low threat level of substitutes for P&G.
Analysis of aircrafts business using porter’s five forces( For aircraft manufacutring)
Consider how Porter’s Five Forces apply to Uber’s business/industry. (Porter’s Five Forces is at an industry level). Pick one force and describe how you believe it impacts Ubers’s profits, favorably or unfavorably. What could Uber do to more favorably position itself for sustained economic profit over the next five years?
For Tesla: a. Conduct a SWOT analysis of the organization. b. Conduct a Porter’s Five Forces analysis of the organization. c. Based upon the two analyses, recommend a strategic approach for the organization. Explain why you have selected that approach based on the analysis results. Incorporate the concepts covered in the course in your response.
Questions and Exercises 1.1 Porter’s Five Forces Applied to the Air Courier Industry. Apply Porter’s five forces to the air courier industry. Industry participants include such firms as FedEx, UPS, and DHL. (Hint: Access Gale’s Business & Company Resource Center, Global Business Browser, or Standard & Poor’s Industry Surveys to obtain the needed information.)
Describe each of the factors in Porter’s Five Forces Model. Summarize the four strategies of Porter’s model of configuration and coordination. What are Porter’s three generic strategies and how are they related to global strategy?
Do Porter’s Five Forces for Intel Corporation in 2017
CORPORATE ANALYSIS CA2.32 The Procter & Gamble Company. The 2019 annual report of The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is available at www.pginvestor.com. After reviewing P&G’s annual report, respond to the following questions: a. P&G’s net income decreased from 2017 through 2019, while sales increased during the sale period. What would account for this? b. P&G’s total assets decreased by approximately $3.2 billion from 2018 to 2019. Which assets principally accounted for this decline? (To answer this question, calculate each...
Analyzing the potential Market-space by using Porter’s Five Forces Analysis is critical to ensure successful decisions. There are a multitude of General Environmental factors and forces that impact the business decision to enter or not enter target market. Even after entry, businesses must remain vigilant about their external environment. Based on your experiences and understanding, what external force(s) have impacted a company you know in a positive or negative manner? minimum 300 words
Read “Better World Books and the Triple Bottom Line” 1. Conduct a Porter’s five forces analysis of the used book industry. Is this an attractive industry? Why or why not? Which force(s) have the strongest influence? (200 words minimum). Please include a word count of your answer. 2. What are BWB’s resources and capabilities? Do they lead to a sustained competitive advantage (Hint: apply the VRIO analysis)? (150 words minimum). Please include a word count of your answer.
Procter and Gamble (PG) paid an annual dividend of $1.71 in 2009. You expect PG to increase its dividends by 8.3% per year for the next five years (through 2014), and thereafter by 3.4% per year. If the appropriate equity cost of capital for Procter and Gamble is 8.5% per year, use the dividend-discount model to estimate its value per share at the end of 2009. The price per share is $17. (Round to the nearest cent.)