Question

A firm has prepared the following binary integer program to evaluate a number of potential locations...

A firm has prepared the following binary integer program to evaluate a number of potential locations for new warehouses. The firm's goal is to maximize the net present value of their decision while not spending more than their currently available capital.

Max 20x1 + 30x2 + 10x3 + 15x4

s.t. 5x1 + 7x2 + 12x3 + 11x4 ≤ 21 {Constraint 1}

x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 ≥ 2 {Constraint 2}

x1 + x2 ≤ 1 {Constraint 3}

x1 + x3 ≥ 1 {Constraint 4}

x2 = x4 {Constraint 5}

Which of the constraints enforces a mutually exclusive relationship?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

X1 + X2 <=1, constraint 3 enforces mutually exclusive relationship. Since all the variables are binary they can either be 0 or 1. So if we make a data table pf all possible outputs for X1 and X2 combination:

X1 X2 X1 + X2
0 0 0
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 2

As you can see above, only when both of them are 1, the mentioned constraint 3 will be violated, thus both the values cannot be 1 at the same time and hence this constraint makes these two variables mutually exclusive.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
A firm has prepared the following binary integer program to evaluate a number of potential locations...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • (1 point) Consider the following maximization problem. Maximize P = 9x1 + 7x2 + x3 subject...

    (1 point) Consider the following maximization problem. Maximize P = 9x1 + 7x2 + x3 subject to the constraints 13x1 x1 - x2 + 6x2 + - 10x3 12x3 = = 20 56 xi 20 x2 > 0 X3 > 0 Introduce slack variables and set up the initial tableau below. Keep the constraints in the same order as above, and do not rescale them. P X X2 X3 S1 RHS

  • 2- The Lofton Company has developed the following linear programming problem with the following f...

    2- The Lofton Company has developed the following linear programming problem with the following functional constraints. Max x1 + x2 s.t. 2x1 + x2 ≤ 10   2x1 + 3x2 ≤ 24   3x1 + 4x2 ≥ 36 After running the solver, they found it infeasible so in revision, Lofton drops the original objective and establishes the three goals: Goal 1: Don't exceed 10 in constraint 1. Goal 2: Don't fall short of 36 in constraint 3. Goal 3: Don't exceed 24...

  • A company has decided to use 0-1 (binary) integer programming to help to make some investment...

    A company has decided to use 0-1 (binary) integer programming to help to make some investment decisions. There are three possible investment alternatives from which to choose, but if it is decided that a particular alternative is to be selected, the entire cost of that alternative will be incurred (i.e., it is impossible to build one-half of a factory). The integer programming model is as follows: Max 5000X1 +7000X2+9000X3 S.t. X1+X2+X3<=2 (only 2 may be chosen) 25000X1+32000X2+29000X3<=62000 (budget limit) 16X1+14X2+19X3<=36...

  • QUESTION 13 A company has decided to use 0-1 (binary) integer programming to help to make...

    QUESTION 13 A company has decided to use 0-1 (binary) integer programming to help to make some investment decisions. There are three possible investment alternatives from which to choose, but if it is decided that a particular alternative is to be selected, the entire cost of that alternative will be incurred (i.e., it is impossible to build one-half of a factory). The integer programming model is as follows: Max 5000X1+7000X2+9000X3 S.t.     X1+X2+X3<=2  (only 2 may be chosen) 25000X1+32000X2+29000X3<=62000 (budget limit)    16X1+14X2+19X3<=36  (resource...

  • QUESTION 13 A company has decided to use 0-1 (binary) integer programming to help to make...

    QUESTION 13 A company has decided to use 0-1 (binary) integer programming to help to make some investment decisions. There are three possible investment alternatives from which to choose, but if it is decided that a particular alternative is to be selected, the entire cost of that alternative will be incurred (i.e., it is impossible to build one-half of a factory). The integer programming model is as follows: Max 5000X1+7000X2+9000X3 S.t. X1+X2+X3<=2 (only 2 may be chosen) 25000X1+32000X2+29000X3<=62000 (budget limit)...

  • Given the following output, what would happen if the coefficient of X2 increased by 1 LINEAR...

    Given the following output, what would happen if the coefficient of X2 increased by 1 LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM MAX 31X1+35X2+32X3 S.T 1) 3X1+5X2+2X3>90 2) 6X1 7X2+8X3<150 3) 5x1+3X2+3X3120 OPTIMAL SOLUTION Objective Function Value 763.333 Variable Value Reduced 13.333 0,000 10.000 0.000 0.000 10.889 X1 X2 X3 Constraint Slack/Surplus Dual Price 0.000 0.000 23.333 0.778 5.556 0.000 OBJECTIVE COEFFICIENT RANGES Lower Current Upper Limit Value Limit No X1 30.000 31000 Upper Limit No X2 Lower 35.000 36.167 Limit No Limit X3...

  • Interpreting an LP output after solving the problem using the software.                The following linear programming problem has been solved using the software. Use the output to answer the questi...

    Interpreting an LP output after solving the problem using the software.                The following linear programming problem has been solved using the software. Use the output to answer the questions below. LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM: MAX 25X1+30X2+15X3 S.T.   1) 4X1+5X2+8X3<1200 2) 9X1+15X2+3X3<1500 OPTIMAL SOLUTION: Objective Function Value =         4700.000   Variable Value Reduced Costs X1 140.000 0.000 X2 0.000 10.000 X3 80.000 0.000 Constraint Slack/Surplus Dual Prices 1 0.000 1.000 2 0.000 2.333 OBJECTIVE COEFFICIENT RANGES: Variable Lower Limit Current Value Upper Limit...

  • if you could only charge $18 for chairs, how is your optimal solution change? Variable Cells...

    if you could only charge $18 for chairs, how is your optimal solution change? Variable Cells Allowable Increase Name Decision Variables X1 Decision Variables X2 Decision Variables X3 Final Value 2.0 0.0 8.0 Reduced Objective Cost Coefficient 0.0 60.0 -5.0 30.0 0.0 20.0 Allowable Decrease 20.0 4.0 5.0 1000000000000000000000000000000.0 2.5 5.0 Constraints Allowable Decrease Name Lumber bdft) Total Finishing (hrs) Total Carpentry (hrs) Total Tables demand (hrs) Final Value 24.0 20.0 8.0 0.0 Shadow Constraint Allowable Price R.H Side Increase...

  • The following linear programming problem has been solved by LINDO. Use the output to answer the...

    The following linear programming problem has been solved by LINDO. Use the output to answer the questions. (Scroll down to see all). LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM MAX 41X1+52X2+21X3 S.T. C.1) 5X1 + 5X2 + 9X3 < 1200 C.2) 11X1 + 14X2 + 5X3 < 1500 END LP OPTIMUM FOUND AT STEP      1         OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUE         1)      5795.049 VARIABLE        VALUE          REDUCED COST         X1 0.000 0.217822         X2         74.247 0.000000         X3 92.079 0.000000        ROW   SLACK OR SURPLUS     DUAL...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT