1.Explain the meaning of a Nash equilibrium. How does it differ from a dominant strategy equilibrium?
2.What is meant by “first mover advantage”? How might moving first give one an advantage in a duopoly situation?
1. Nash Equilibrium is the best strategy that a player takes in a game and he has no incentive to shift from his chosen strategy, taking into consideration the other player's decision. It is was developed by Prof. John Nash.
A dominant strategy is a choice of strategy of a player that dominates the other available strategies of other players. It is the best strategy no matter what the other player plays. While, nash equilibrium is the best strategy in response to the other players strategy.
A dominant strategy is a Nash equilibrium, the converse maynot be true.
2. The first mover advantage is the comparitive advantage that a players gains because he entered the market, first. In a Stackelberg sequential game of duopoly. If firm 1 has a first mover advantage, then it will be the leader and can limit firm 2's options. Adoption of a high initial production capacity gives firm 1 an advantage and hence no much options are left for firm 2.
1.Explain the meaning of a Nash equilibrium. How does it differ from a dominant strategy equilibrium?...
5. Explain the difference between a Nash equilibrium and a dominant strategies equilibrium. Give an example to show how the prisoners' dilemma helps to explain behaviour. 6. Why might a firm set prices based on a markup above average cost rather than equalising marginal costs and marginal benefits? 7. Using a diagram, explain how an external cost of production (i.e. a negative production externality) can be internalised with a tax. |8. Explain the conditions of price discrimination. Give two examples...
6. If a single strategy is always optimal, regardless of opponents' strategies, then it is a a. First-mover advantage b. A Nash equilibrium c. Prisoners Dilemma d. A dominant strategy 7. In a market with a monopolist, which of the following pricing strategies maximizes total social welfare (no deadweight loss)? a. Perfect price discrimination b. Block pricing C. Group price discrimination d. None of the above; all monopolist pricing strategies create a deadweight loss Questions 8, and 9 refer to...
game theory strategy and dominant strategies E F 1. (5 points) Can the game theory approach described in chapter 10 be used to analyze the model of Perfect Competition? Please explain. 2. (5 points) Use the following payoff matrix for a simultaneous move one shot game to answer the following questions Player 2 Strategy с D Player 1 A 6, 14 7, 11 18, 20 10, 19 B 12, 5 15, 1 7, 25 16, 17 (a) Does player 1...
a) Explain what is meant by the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” game. Do players have a dominant strategy in this game? b) Create an example of a pay-off matrix for such a game c) Will the Nash equilibrium of this game result in the socially optimal outcome? *Explain why/why not* Your answer will be marked according to the following categories. PART A PART B PART C General Clarity of Explanations
a) Explain why in a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium each player must be indifferent between the pure strategies that are used in her mixed strategy. b) How will the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium be affected if the payoff that the players get from both holding their investments are increased (keeping all other payoffs the same)? c) How can this change in mix probabilities be interpreted in terms of the players' uncertain subjective beliefs? Andile Sell Hold Hold R10m, R10m R1m,...
1. In your own words, explain what Korsakoff Syndrome is. 2.How does FTD differ from Alzheimer’s disease? 3. Give two examples of how the progression of dementia impacts on a person. 4. What is the link between the onset of dementia and depression? 5. . Why might a person with dementia experience feelings of despair?
1. Find the dominant stratgey for Coca-cola and explain your answer with numeric/ word answer. 2.What is the dominant strategy for Pepsi? Explain your answer. 3. Does a Nash Equilibrium strategy exist for each firm? For which one? Explain answer. ayoffs for Coca Cola are given in red and those for Pepsi are given in blu Pepsi Discount Price(*Left) Pricing Strategy Regular Price ("Right") Discount $5 bI, $3bl $10 bt $2bl Price Coca ("Up") Cola Regular Price $6 bl, $4...
7. (10 points) Nash Equilibrium. See: Lectures 21-23 How to Slides (How to work our whether an equilibrium is efficient; How to find Nash equilibrium) Firm A and Firm B are trying to make decisions where each of their profits depend upon their decisions and the other firm's decisions, Each has 3 possible strategies. Firm A can choose "up". "middle" or "down" and firm B can choose "left","middle" or "right." Firm B Middle Left Firm A: 34 Firm B: S...
• What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? A) Alistair increases its advertising budget, but Baine does not. B) Baine increases its advertising budget, but Alistair does not. C) Both Alistair and Baine increase their advertising budgets. D) There is no Nash equilibrium. • How are the firms in this advertising game caught in a prisoner's dilemma? A) They are not in a prisoner's dilemma because there is one clear strategy for each B) They would be more profitable...
Answer two of the three forum questions, listed below. 1. How do the product-dominant and service-dominant approaches to marketing differ? 2. What are the four types of consumer offerings? How do they differ from one another? 3.Identify two consumer products sold in a grocery store or by a mass merchandiser such as Walmart. Explain the strategies used to introduce each of the products or which strategy you feel will be most successful.