Question

From the merger of Arlington Oil and Dunsford Petroleum company,based on the information on the merger,what is the summary, Introduction and conclusion?

Answer 1

The answer is provided according to HomeworkLib policy.

The is provided From the merger of Arlington Oil and Dunsford Petroleum company,based on the information on the merger.

1. Summary • Peter Lundgren had taken many coffee before the meeting with Stanley Ashton. • Peter and Stanley were trying something from the merger of Arlington Oil and with Dunsford Petroleum Co. The merger is believed to be an asset for the both company for it to be able to compete with Giant Corporation. The merger could generate significant cost savings in refining, marketing, and transportation and more capital to fund worldwide exploration and production • The integration of two organization has begun which is believed to generate effective human resource integration strategy which will result to operating efficiencies. • Arlington had left two managers for almost every available position at upper and middle management level. Prior to the merger, the top levels had been selected. Lundgren and Ashton had decided a negotiation that they could keep his most trusted executives on board. From the Persons Involved Effect Company Bought by Dunsford > Director of HR > Both of the company Ashton > Head of Global Marketting has the ability to lose > Chief Information Officer the best managers Bought by Arlington > Chief Operating Officer since they already Lundgren > Chief Financial Officer taken the action of > Head of Research and considering other jobs Development base on the uncertainty that they can still keep their jobs due to the merger. • Several of the best managers had already taken the first action, which was to take other jobs from the company because of the uncertainty of the decisions the will be coming from Ashton and Lundgren negotiation base from the merger.

2. Problem Statement • Peter Lundgren should be calm before the meeting because too much coffee could cloud any of his judgment • As the two company merge, the two cultures is also merging which is difficult. • Peter is biased regarding with his decision and towards some of his own executives because he knows them. The test that'll be conducted will take too long, which can result to both of the companies to lose some of the best managers and go to their already applied job from the different company. 3. Analysis of the Problem The Merger of both company could generate an asset that will improved the effectivity of the company and income. Since both of the company is merging, the cultural environment of both company is also merger which will lead to a single position will be left from both of them. This will result to one of the employee of both will be fired and the other will keep his job which will be decided based from Peter and Stanley. The decision will be judge base on the degree whether the employee is a significant one and deserve to take the position, so the company will have to execute an evaluation test. Some of the best significant managers already knew that this is coming, that they already applied from the different company because of the uncertainty of losing their current job. These decisions are tough for both of Peter and Stanley that they could lose some of the best manager that can contribute from the company merge. 4. Objectives • To have a successful merge of both of the company. To have a successful merge with both of the company different cultures. • To keep the significant personnel (the managers), and sort out the other people carefully. 5. Alternative Courses of Action • Peter should make his decision based from the fact of the history of the person, output of the employees and base from the evaluation test and interview he executed to them. If the managers were applied already to different companies, let them have it. Due to the fact that you cannot already secure their current positions on the company because of the merging.

• Peter should make his decision base from the past output of a certain person. If the person is having a 2nd plan base of the uncertainty, Peter can generate results base from the history of a person's effectivity. 6. Selection and Justification of Chosen Alternative My selection of alternative course was the last one. Peter should make his decision base from the facts. The history of a person on his past job and what did he/she achieved on the company before the merge. Since the Evaluation Test will take some time that Peter and Ashton could put in a bad state of losing the best managers, both of the person could evaluate them from the past records and base from what they already have done on the company. By this they could really see what's the best offer can a person for that position can be. After a decision has been made the person that will retain his job should be put on his current position and keep it while the other person which cannot keep the job (a person that will be fired) can freely go to his/her already applied from the company. The company should also put credit to the persons who will be getting fired like a recommendation that this person can really do and excel with the job and an additional bonus (money) for what they done on the company's current success. 7. Conclusion and Recommendation. 7.1 Conclusions Peter should decide base from the facts what his people can do and what they have already achieved by this he can achieved or decide who is the best person for the company retain his job. The person who is getting to get fired should have a credit because of what they have done on the company. The company can offer money due that he will be getting fired, and a recommendation from the best company in order to practice his profession and keep his pride at still. 7.2 Recommendations I would recommend that the merge should be put in a go. The evaluation should be made and the person that will be fired should have a credit for what he had contributed on the company. By this, it is a win-win situation for the company without having the people that will be fired be mad at them or can hold grudge from the company