For two ideal polarizers, the light intensity when the polarizers are at 90 should be zero. Why was the light intensity for the two polarizers at 90 not zero?
The light has no memory. When it passes through the second polariser, there is no information whatsoever of its previous polarisation. It could have been whatever!
When light goes through a polariser at 90ºand 90º, it gets tilted at the cost of some lost intensity. In other words, it gets projected on the polariser axis, that is rotated a bit with respect to the light polarisation vector. This new light then goes on to the next one, and gets tilted again.
You get the picture. You can use this idea to arbitrarily change the polarisation angle of light by putting many of them in series. The more steps you do, the more polarisers you use, and thus, the smaller the steps, more light will come out on the other side (in reality, you always loose some light because they are not completely transparent, so you don't want to use many of them).
For two ideal polarizers, the light intensity when the polarizers are at 90 should be zero....
5. Linearly polarized light with an original intensity lo passes through two ideal polarizers having their polarizing axes turned at 120P to each other. After passing through both polarizers, the intensity of the light is, A. (%)し B. (3)0.5/41。 C. (1/4) Lo D. (3)05/2I E. (1/8)10
how did the light intensity with two polarizers at 45 compare to the light intensity with two polarizers at 0? explain
how did the light intensity with two polarizers at 45 compare to the light intensity with two polarizers at 0? explain
You need to rotate a laser beam 90°. What is the minimum number of ideal polarizers it would take to accomplish this feat? What would be the maximum light intensity? How many polarizers would you need so that at least 80% of the light gets through? What would be the ideal angle between the polarizers?
Light is passing through two polarizers. The intensity of the light coming out of the second polarizer is 44% less than the intensity of the light coming out of the first polarizer. What is the angle in degrees between two polarizers?
Unpolarized light with initial intensity of Io goes through two linear polarizers. The first polarizer has a transmission axis at an angle of 45 with respect to the vertical and the second polarizer has a transmission axis at an angle of 60 with respect to the vertical. 28) What is the final intensity of light? a) 0.500 Io b) 0.467 Io c) 0.250 Io d) 0.125 Io e) 0 29) If a third polarizer with a transmission axis at an...
A beam of initially unpolarized light passes through a sequence of three ideal polarizers. The angle between the axes of the and second polarizers, labeled P12, is 22.1° and the angle between the axes of the second and third polarizers, labeled 023, 53.3°. What is the ratio of the intensity of light emerging from the third polarizer, 13 , to the intensity of light incident on the first polarizer, I ? A beam of unpolarized light shines on a stack...
Unpolarized light with intensity I0 is incident on two polarizers as sketched in the figure below. Suppose the angle between the axes of the two polarizers is ? =66
A beam of initially unpolarized light passes through a sequence of three ideal polarizers. The angle between the axes of the first and second polarizers is 21.7 degree, and the angle between the axes of the second and third polarizers is 52.9 degree. What is the ratio of the intensity of light emerging from the third polarizer, I_3, to the intensity of light incident on the first polarizer, I_0? I_3/I_0 =
A beam of initially unpolarized light passes through a sequence of three ideal polarizers. The angle between the axes of the first and second polarizers, labeled ?12 , is 21.9∘ and the angle between the axes of the second and third polarizers, labeled ?23 , is 57.5∘ . What is the ratio of the intensity of light emerging from the third polarizer, ?3 , to the intensity of light incident on the first polarizer, ?0 ?