Given the DCPIP standard curve and the equation of a straight line obtained for the curve is:
y = 0.0081x
we would be able to determine the uM concentration corresponding to the absorbance obtained by solving for x in the above formula:
DCPIP (uM) : x = y / 0.0081, where y would be the absorbance value.
Now, let us look at table 1:
tube | A600nm 5 mins | A600nm 35 mins | ![]() |
![]() |
1 | 0.741 | 0.62 | 0.121 | 14.9 |
From the absorbance values, we can subtract the value obtained for 35 min from the 5 min value to get a final absorbance of 0.121
The corresponding DCPIP concentration can be determined by solving for x:
x = 0.121 / 0.0081 = 14.9 uM DCPIP
Now, let us look at the second table:
tube | umoles DCPIP / min. |
Volume of extract assayed mL |
Activity umoles/mL/min. |
Specific activity umoles/min./mg |
1 | 0.0005 | 0.01 | 0.0005 | 0.0014 |
Firstly, let us calculate the protein concentration of PNS:
The concentration is given as 0.7 mg / mL of the extract diluted 1 / 10 and then 1 / 5.
The total dilution of the extract would be: 1 / 10 * 1 / 5 = 1 / 50, which means the extract is diluted 50 times.
The dilution factor would thus be 50.
The actual protein concentration of the extract is: 50 * 0.7 = 35 mg / mL.
Now, let us go back to table 2:
The volume of extract is not mentioned here, but let us assume 0.01 mL or 10 uL is used for the assay. The amount of protein used would then be 35 * 0.01 = 0.35 mg
We are asked to calculate umoles DCPIP per minute.
Molarity = moles / liter. A molar solution would contain 1 mole of the substance per liter.
1 uM = 1 umole / L; 1 nmole / mL
We obtained 14.9 uM DCPIP per 30 min. reaction (35 - 5 min.)
concentration of DCPIP per min. would be : 14.9 / 30 = 0.5 uM DCPIP = 0.5 nmoles DCPIP / min.
Assuming the reaction volume as 1 mL, the umoles DCPIP would be :0.5 / 1000 = 0.0005 umoles /mL/min.
Given the protein used is 0.35 mg (10 uL extract), the specific activity is determined by finding the umoles DCPIP per mg protein.
Specific activity (umoles/mg protein) = 0.0005 / 0.35 = 0.0014 umoles/min./mg
The values may vary depending upon the actual volume of enzyme used, and the reaction volume..
1. Carefully explain how to complete the table below to determine the SDH specific activity in...
Sucrose Levels Data: Tube # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 `0 11 Water (mL) 1.0 0.75 0.5 0.25 Glucose Std. (mL) 0.25 0.5 0.75 1.0 Sucrose Std. (mL) 1.0 1.0 CONC. Extract (mL) 1.0 1.0 Diluted Extract (mL) 1.0 1.0 Buffer (mL) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 TUBE VS ABSORBANCES: 1 blank 2 .071 3 .535 4 .551 5 .042 6 0 7 .306 8 .056 9 1.999 10 .025 11 .35 A)...
Table 1; of absorbance vs. concentration on a graph sheet (use pencil, properly amylase from two sources as samples (unknowns) were also treated in d. The experimental set-up of Table 1, indicate whether it was derived using serial e. In Table 2, considering the original salivary amylase samples, which one of the b. Plot curve labeled graph will be noted or generate an excel-sheet): Use graph to extrapo late the unknowns and determine their concentrations; e. Salivary the same protocol...
Complete the purification table below for that group using the information supplied in Tables 1 & 2. You may refer to the description in your lab manual on how to calculate these parameters and account for any dilutions. Sample Activity Total (ABS/min/mL) activity (ABS/min OR U) Protein Concentration (mg/mL) Total Protein (mg) Specific activity (ABS/min/mg OR U/mg) Fold Purification RP PPE [28 marks] Table 1: Triplicate absorbance data of Group A for the catechol assay of banana PPO after 2...
Based on the document below,
1. Describe the hypothesis Chaudhuri et al ids attempting to
evaluate; in other words, what is the goal of this paper? Why is he
writing it?
2. Does the data presented in the paper support the hypothesis
stated in the introduction? Explain.
3.According to Chaudhuri, what is the potential role of thew
alkaline phosphatase in the cleanup of industrial waste.
CHAUDHURI et al: KINETIC BEHAVIOUR OF CALF INTESTINAL ALP WITH PNPP 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10,...