Question

Considering that Progressives were against war Do you believe that Wilson was betraying or representing Progressive ideals? Explain your assertion.

Answer 1

Pgup home que considecing that progressives were against wat, Do you believe that wilson was betraying oc representing progressive Ideals. 2. Express your assection. M Ang Mode than betraying with say, as wills also believed can say it is culmination. Hundred years ago 1914 world was I Stacted. It was tuff and bold decision by president wilson, wilson having entention that it will change the entice future of human civilization. Was had been beutal. to The Us entry on would was I often cegueded as the end of the progressive movement, since 1901 that had seen de form-minded activism embeared by the nationcel goveenment. In this interpretation America joining the war amounted to nothing less than the betrayal of all progressive ampulses & object Suzaended to the type of uncivilized militarism many progressives bitterly opposed & for which they blambed the wat is the 1st place. But in ceality and it's fact that american entry into wat was the apotheosis of progress) vism, it's not a betrayal of it's central tenets .. Amecica joining the wat was clothed in proge essive chetoric with the goal being nothing less than ending was focene as a blight on humanity.

pdoce he Ads ししししししいいいいいいいいいい The progressive mentality in us appe Jocral & political problems not as conditions to be managed but as things a modeen. As wilson said sia in senate in Jan 1917 that "The world must be made safe for como also he added that us has no selfish eats end to sedle. We deslee no conquest, no dominion. foe wilson there is no betrayal of progressivis As Eucopean recalcitrance regarding peace. wilson to the odd insistance that amecica poacticpate in the was not as an ally of the beltish and the French, but as associated power. Foe wilson the diffecence beti between them was important, As Ameci ca was not fighting for same goal for which other nations ware fighting. Amecica was fighting to end wat peemanently. If all thing sum up for advocating Ap becal enteenaf Ponalism, he called for collective secuesty & national self defeamination, as he wanted democeatic states to create the leagree of Nations as a pactores pactneeship for peace in a new world oaded. All like wise another side of coin in his thinking and stateccaft, the text of modeen. I Pbec alism was entecofwined with co subtext. of white eacism

His diplomacy & his legacy of wilsonianism combined eac'sm with liberalism. - Many of be calism also & political scientists abo typically identified wilsonian diplomacy only with li becalism. As Racism may shaped his undeestanding of America's national Identity, & global mission & thus chis vision of Albecal democracy & peace.